The Corner

Nicholas Kristof Shouldn’t Follow Peter Singer

This weekend has been laud Peter Singer time in the media. Apparently the utilitarian Princeton bioethicist has a book coming telling people how to donate to charity–and the liberals are swooning.

Now, NYT’s pundit, Nicholas Kristof, turns to Singer as a legitimate judge of moral choices in his current column. From, “The Trader Who Donates Half His Pay:”

[Matt] Wage is an exemplar of a new movement called “effective altruism,” aimed at taking a rigorous, nonsentimental approach to making the maximum difference in the world. Singer has been a leader in this movement, and in a book scheduled to be released in the coming week he explores what it means to live ethically.

The book, “The Most Good You Can Do,” takes a dim view of conventional charitable donations, such as supporting art museums or universities, churches or dog shelters. Singer asks: Is supporting an art museum really as socially useful as, say, helping people avoid blindness?

People who want to lead an ethical life should no more follow Singer than they would a KKK grand dragon who also believes in supporting cancer research.

As I point out over at Human Exceptionalism, Singer:

  • Supports the moral propriety of infanticide;
  • Believes the severely disabled people should be experimented on in place of animals that have greater cognitive capacities;
  • Doesn’t think there is anything particularly wrong with bestiality;
  • Would create a sub-class of human beings, so-called “non-persons” that would be exploitable as natural resources–as he would raise some animals to the status of equal “persons.”

Granted, Kristof is not most people’s idea of a deep thinker. But he isn’t a discerning one either when he looks to Peter Singer as a proper arbiter of what is right and what is wrong.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

The Second(-Class) Amendment

Editor’s Note: The following is the fourth in a series of articles in which Mr. Yoo and Mr. Phillips will lay out a course of constitutional restoration, pointing out areas where the Supreme Court has driven the Constitution off its rails and the ways the current Court can put it back on track. The first entry ... Read More

The Brexit Crisis

After what seem like years of a phony war, British and European Union negotiators finally agreed on the terms of Britain’s departure from the EU earlier this week, and Theresa May announced it in the House of Commons. The deal covers more than 500 pages of legal and bureaucratic prose, and few but the ... Read More

Friends of Elmer

Do you know what scares an American outdoorsman more than a grizzly bear? Twitter. In the late summer and early autumn, the hunting world had its eyes on the courts: The Trump administration had issued new guidance that would permit the hunting of brown bears (popularly known as grizzly bears), including in ... Read More