The Corner

No Easy Exclusions in Tax Reform

As the debate over tax reform and revenue increases has developed, Mitt Romney’s suggestion to raise taxes (on the rich, essentially) with a cap on itemized deductions has gained some traction. The Tax Policy Center has assessed the idea at a few different levels, and the amount of revenue you can raise is really quite substantial: A $25,000 cap could raise about $1.2 trillion over the next ten years, which is substantially more than the president’s proposal to let the Bush tax cuts for high-income earners would raise. (The president also has a plan to limit the value of deductions for those earning over $250,000 by capping the value of these deductions at 28 percent, down the 30 or so percent those taxpayers would otherwise get; this raises, according to the president’s budget, $584 billion over ten years.)

One of the problems with a cap like that, however, is that it would dramatically alter the incentives for wealthy Americans to give generously to charity. While political conservatives are understandably wary of government’s using tax policy to encourage certain activities, the charitable tax deduction has a fairly simple defense to recommend it: Americans, especially wealthy ones, are generous partly because tax policy has made it a really useful way to reduce their tax liabilities, and that generosity is a lot of the reason why American civil society flourishes. Someone’s got to pay for the little platoons, basically.

Yuval Levin has written a lot for NR about this president’s efforts to remake America as a “hollow republic“; it seems like the wrong time for conservatives to propose diverting funds Americans might send to charity to the federal government instead.

But unfortunately if unsurprisingly, exempting the charitable deduction from the cap significantly reduces the revenue the cap can be expected to raise, by a third or more (the higher the cap, the bigger the relative losses of exempting the charitable deduction). The chart below tells the story:

The moral here is that tax reform is hardly a free lunch — the president hates accelerated depreciation for corporate jets and the Right hates tax credits for solar panels, but they’re not the really big expenditures in our tax code. However, despite the revenue lost by excluding the charitable deduction, one fact to recommend the policy is that, obviously, no one is too worried about the distortionary effects of Americans’ giving too much to charity, or less so, you assume than we should be about inflating the housing market or accruing unnecessary health-care costs.

Patrick Brennan — Patrick Brennan is a writer and policy analyst based in Washington, D.C. He was Director of Digital Content for Marco Rubio's presidential campaign, writing op-eds, policy content, and leading the ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More
U.S.

Political Theatrics

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including all you whippersnappers under the age of 50), I’m writing this from somewhere over the Atlantic. At least I hope that’s ... Read More