The Corner

World

Dutch Teen Not Euthanized, Died by (Abetted) Self-Starvation

On June 4, news outlets around the world reported that Dutch doctors euthanized a 17-year-old rape victim who suffered from severe PTSD, depression, and anorexia. I discussed that story here.

As reported by Politico Europe, the original story was wrong (leading to a revision from me). Noa Pothoven was not lethally injected. She was allowed –and perhaps helped, if she received palliative care — to starve/dehydrate herself to death. She decided to kill herself after being refused electro-shock therapy, (according to Politico reporter Naomi O’Leary) due to her age. In other words, doctors allowed her anorexia to win.

The euthanasia movement has a name for this kind of suicide: VSED for voluntary stop eating and drinking. It is pushed as a way to die in circumstances in which euthanasia and assisted suicide are illegal, or for those who don’t quality for legal assisted suicide or euthanasia, particularly the elderly. In British Columbia, it is also allowed to be a means of qualifying for lethal injection euthanasia by permitting the suicidal person becomes sufficiently debilitated to make their homicide legal.

VSED is an aided — or perhaps, better stated, abetted — suicide. I claim this for two reasons:

  1. The suicidal person is not prevented from self-killing. It’s as if one sees a person cutting their wrist and doesn’t take the knife away and/or try to staunch the arterial bleeding. By refusing to have the VSED victim hospitalized for care — including forced feeding, if necessary — the suicide is abetted by allowing the means and cause of death to proceed without impediment.
  2. VSED usually involves doctors palliating the physical suffering caused by self-starvation and dehydration. That’s a form of facilitation because — depending on whether the patient is rendered unconscious — the patient can’t change their mind or will be less likely to because the physical impact is substantially ameliorated. It is worth noting here, that the Politico reporter who corrected the erroneous earlier stories, reported in a Twitter thread that palliative care was involved in Pothoven’s care as she died.

This case reminds me of the 2006 suicide of Kerrie Woolterton in the U.K. Woolterton swallowed anti-freeze and called an ambulance. But she pinned a note on her blouse saying she didn’t want medical treatment. Instead of pumping her stomach and saving her life as they had done before, the doctors instead stood back and did nothing as she died a slow and painful death.

I guess we are supposed to be relieved that Pothoven wasn’t lethally injected — although I assume some are saying to themselves that such a killing would be more humane, which is the point of VSED — to get people to accept lethal injections instead of rejecting facilitated deaths.

But forgive me if I don’t breathe a sigh of relief. There are other ways to abandon despairing patients than lethally injecting them.

Most Popular

White House

Nikki Haley Has a Point

Nikki Haley isn’t a Deep Stater. She’s not a saboteur. She wouldn’t undermine the duly elected president, no siree! That’s the message that comes along with Haley’s new memoir With All Due Respect. In that book, she gives the politician’s review of her career so far, shares some details about her ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
Books

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More