The Corner

Not War But Law Enforcment — the September 10th Approach Continues its Comeback

Former Attorney General Reno, along with other former federal prosecutors, has filed an amicus brief in the 4th Circuit challenging the indefinite detention of alien enemy combatants.  (See Washington Post story, here).  The case is somewhat unusual in that it involves a non-American combatant who was captured inside the U.S. (Everyone held at GITMO was captured outside the U.S.)  The distinction should not be meaningful.  In its 2004 Hamdi case, the Supreme Court held that a U.S. citizen can be held as an enemy combatant; if that is the case, an alien should be detainable regardless of where captured.

According to the Post, the former prosecutors contend “that criminal [i.e., civilian] courts are well equipped to prosecute terrorism suspects while guaranteeing the constitutional rights of defendants arrested on U.S. soil.”  The basis for this claim is, of course, that the civilian courts have been used successfully before — indeed, in AG Reno’s term, they had a perfect conviction record.

Unfortunately, the issue is not whether courts can conduct such trials and provide due process.  Those are the things lawyers tend to care about.  The real issue is whether the civilian justice system works as a national security matter, not a due process matter.  In the 90′s, while we were batting a thousand in terrorism trials, we were also managing to take out less than three dozen mostly low-level jihadists — out of an enemy that was growing in strength and audacity.  The trials may have been a model of due process, but they were an abysmal response to war.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More
Film & TV

Joker: An Honest Treatment of Madness

When I saw that the New York Times and The New Yorker had run columns berating the new Joker movie, criticizing it not simply on cinematic grounds but instead insisting that the film amounted to a clandestine defense of “whiteness” in an attempt to buttress the electoral aim of “Republicans” — this is a ... Read More

The Origins of the Transgender Movement

Editor’s Note: This article has been adapted from remarks delivered at a Heritage Foundation summit. I’ve been asked to talk about the origins of transgenderism and how it relates to children and their exploitation. But first, I would like to start with a little story. Yesterday I was wandering around ... Read More

The Democrats’ Disastrous CNN LGBT Town Hall

A few days after Donald Trump committed the worst foreign-policy blunder of his presidency by betraying America’s Kurdish allies in northern Syria, former vice president Joe Biden, the elder statesman and co-frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary, was on a national stage talking to CNN’s primetime ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More