The Corner


Notre Dame Still Stands

Fire fighters douse flames of the burning Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, France April 15, 2019. (Charles Platiau/Reuters)

On my second visit to Notre Dame Cathedral, I climbed the stairs and found the view of Paris obscured by a thick and grimy fog. Yesterday it was my view of the Cathedral that was obscured; not by fog, but smoke.

The world watched in a horrified stupor as flames engulfed the Gothic monument. The spire collapsed. From its fiery interior, the Eucharist, the crown of thorns and artwork was saved. But much else was destroyed.

Is there symbolism in this?

Watching Notre Dame burn, I was reminded of the opening passage of George Weigel’s The Cube and the Cathedral, a meditation on the death of European Christianity, published in 2005. The “cube” Weigel refers to is La Grande Arche de la Défense — a modern architectural monstrosity that began construction in 1985 — and the “Cathedral” is Notre Dame. Weigel wrote:

Which culture, I wondered, would better protect human rights? Which culture would more firmly secure the moral foundations of democracy? The culture that built this stunning, rational, angular, geometrically precise but essentially featureless cube? Or the culture that produced the vaulting and bosses, the gargoyles and flying buttresses, the nooks and crannies, the asymmetries and holy “unsameness” of Notre-Dame and the other great Gothic cathedrals of Europe?

Notre Dame took more than 200 years to complete. Construction began in 1163 during the reign of King Louis VII and was completed in 1345. It survived the hooligans and vandals of the French Revolution. It became the backdrop for Victor Hugo’s The Hunchback of Notre Dame. It hosted the crowning ceremony of Napoleon Bonaparte and the beatification of Saint Joan of Arc. It endured the devastation of two world wars.

Then yesterday, its medieval interior was destroyed in a matter of hours.

It didn’t all happen yesterday. In recent decades, Notre-Dame had fallen into disrepair and required major renovation. Much like the Catholic Church more generally which has been besieged by moral decay; or, an “absence of God,” according to Pope Emeritus Benedict.

For so many of the Faithful, then, talk of rebuilding Notre-Dame is a metaphor for European Christianity more generally. How easy it was to destroy truth, goodness, and beauty! And how difficult it seems to restore . . .

Yet, this morning, the view of Notre-Dame’s interior is a powerful symbol of hope. The Cathedral was declared structurally sound. The front altar is surrounded by smoke and rubble, but the cross, unscathed, is still raised high.

Madeleine Kearns is a William F. Buckley Fellow in Political Journalism at the National Review Institute. She is from Glasgow, Scotland, and is a trained singer.

Most Popular

White House

Nikki Haley Has a Point

Nikki Haley isn’t a Deep Stater. She’s not a saboteur. She wouldn’t undermine the duly elected president, no siree! That’s the message that comes along with Haley’s new memoir With All Due Respect. In that book, she gives the politician’s review of her career so far, shares some details about her ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More