The Corner

NPR = Stimulus?

Byron York’s column on Schiller-aquiddick has an interesting nugget:

Meanwhile Democrats, faced with the task of supporting continued federal funding for NPR in light of the sting tape, are re-casting their arguments in defense of public radio. “The fact of the matter is that NPR is not the most important part of the public broadcasting the debate,” said Democratic Rep. Earl Blumenauer, a public broadcasting supporter who brought PBS cartoon character “Arthur the Aardvark” to Capitol Hill recently to lobby for continued federal funding. The real issue, Blumenauer said, is public broadcasting stations, which would lose part of their funding (estimated at 10 percent) if federal funds were shut off. “Not only do our local public broadcasting stations provide us with valuable information, but they also directly support 21,000 jobs in hundreds of communities across America,” Blumenauer said. “These jobs would be at risk if small stations that rely on federal funding were forced to close their doors.”

Well, if the millions in taxpayer funds given to public radio create 21,000 jobs, let’s just double the sum and create 42,000 jobs. Heck, why not just have 100 percent tax rates and create jobs for everyone!

Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More