Here’s NYT on the New York marriage decision.
Note that the decision was 4 to 2, not 5 to 2 as I mistakenly wrote earlier. Beyond the refusal to find a right to same-sex marriage in New York’s constitution, I think the news here is the finding that there is indeed a rational argument to be made for defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman. See the NYT article for a summary. I link to the full opinion below.