The Corner

Obama, Abortion and Catholics

The New York Times has an article today fretting that Obama’s views on abortion may divide Catholics. The piece is notable for a few reasons, but perhaps the most important is that it’s one of the rare times that the mainstream media has referred to Obama’s 2002 vote against the Induced Birth Infant Liability Act (“IBILA”) while he was in the Illinois state legislature.

IBILA would’ve extended the same medical care to babies born after surviving an abortion attempt, as is enjoyed by all babies born alive. When a similar measure, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act (“BAIPA”) was introduced in the U.S. senate not one senator voted against it. Even NARAL didn’t oppose it.

The Times dutifully reports Obama’s claim that he would’ve voted for BAIPA had he been in the U.S. senate because BAIPA wouldn’t have threatened Roe v. Wade. Obama supposedly questioned the constitutionality of IBILA, contending that conferring equal protection/personhood upon a “pre-viable fetus” would render the bill an unlawful anti-abortion measure.

Obama’s rationale for voting against IBILA is questionable at best. What isn’t questionable is that Obama, the constitutional law lecturer at U.of Chicago Law School, offered no amendments to cure IBILA’s purported defect so that it would be just as constitutional as BAIPA, the bill for which he now claims he would have voted. Rather, after voting against IBILA, the bill was referred to a committee he chaired where he killed it by never bringing it up again for a vote. (It’s also worth noting that while Obama voted “present” 100+ times in the Illinois state legislature, in this particular case he bestirred himself to vote “no”.)   Political savants maintain that the candidate who raises the abortion issue hurts himself. I haven’t seen data to confirm the point, but maybe Obama is banking on McCain not raising the issue. Clearly, Obama’s supporters must recognize the issue as a toxic one, not just with Catholics, but with nearly everyone – for it goes beyond abortion. At what point after birth does Obama call a baby a person and not a fetus?  One week?  Six months? Will any reporter ask him?

Peter Kirsanow — Peter N. Kirsanow is an attorney and a member of the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More