The Corner

Obama, the Passive-Aggressive President

Like everyone else who has commented, I too have been watching with mounting amazement at how weakly Obama is starting out of the gate.  It was not that hard to imagine that a Congress with public-approval ratings in the single digits would set out so assiduously to drive its ratings asymptotically to zero, the Democrats having long ago become, for a long list of profound reasons, predominantly a congressional rather than executive party, which is why both Carter and Clinton came to grief on Capitol Hill.  But I didn’t think Obama would botch it so badly as to put his near 70-percent approval rating in peril so quickly.

What’s wrong with this picture, and why, seemingly, can’t David Axelrod see it?  No wonder Republicans suddenly have a spring in their step and a zip in their speech.

Sorry always to bring things back to my (our) hero, Ronaldus Maximus, but the Gipper didn’t make the mistake of thinking a landslide election win meant he could declare “I won.”  To the contrary, a report of the Initial Actions Project–the detailed blueprint for Reagan’s first year in office–says this: “The election was not a bestowal of political power, but a stewardship opportunity for us to reconsider and restructure the political agenda for the next two decades.  The public has sanctioned the search for a new public philosophy to govern America.”  In other words, “we’re going to need to argue for our program.”  This was a practical necessity, since Democrats still controlled the House.  

There is one other passage from that strategy memo that the Obamanauts could read with profit, reflecting on the mistakes of Jimmy Carter–mistakes that Obama seems to be following:

When Jimmy Carter assumed the presidency he tried to move on many fronts simultaneously—energy, welfare reform, government reorganization, a tax stimulus package, tax reform. . .   He had so many priorities that he had no priorities.  After a frantic week in announcing his energy program, a struggle he called the ‘moral equivalent of war,’ he seemingly lost interest in the issue.  He laid it all out and expected the country and Congress to respond.  He failed to realize that leadership means more than ‘laying it all out;’ it also means keeping at it.

Most Popular

White House

Democrats in Peril

I will just make a prediction and try to keep out of the swamp of Trump-obsession as the weeks unfold. The anti-Trump movement is now in inexorable decline; it is a little like the Nixon defense forces after the Saturday Night drama in October 1973, with the departure of the attorney general, his deputy, and ... Read More

Canada Is Attacked Again

Media coverage of yesterday’s monstrous van attack in Toronto, which as of this writing is responsible for ten deaths and more than a dozen other casualties, was punctuated by political press conferences of the sort that are now an inescapable part of the dark theater of public tragedies. At his first ... Read More

Trump and the North Korean Tipping Point

The world has been stunned by North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un’s announcement last week that he was suspending his country’s nuclear tests in preparation for the impending meeting with President Trump. Even critics have had to concede that Trump’s bellicose rhetoric since last summer regarding the North ... Read More
Politics & Policy

E Pluribus . . . Gridlock

A mantra we hear everywhere these days is that diversity is a good thing. And no doubt, it is. Diversity facilitates an exchange of ideas and opinions, and it promotes economic growth. Moreover, the alternative to diversity is to suppress the views and opinions of some subset of citizens, which is completely ... Read More
Economy & Business

Trade Misunderstandings

I was distracted by other policy topics last week but not enough not to notice Peter Navarro’s article in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “China’s Faux Comparative Advantage.” Considering Navarro’s position in the White House, it is unfortunate that it demonstrates some serious misunderstandings ... Read More