The Corner

Obama’s Divestment Dog Whistle

President Obama has escalated his war . . . on coal. Now Obama has declared war on America’s entire conventional energy industry. For the second time, most recently in his weekend UC Irvine climate address, Obama has signaled support for the campus fossil-fuel divestment movement. Since the goal of this movement is literally the destruction of America’s fossil-fuel industry, Obama must send his signal via dog whistle.

In his Irvine address, Obama called on students to “divest from what harms.” That had campus divestment Facebook pages lighting up in recognition of the presidential endorsement. Meanwhile, most Americans have no idea that Obama has thrown his support behind a radical movement dedicated to the destruction of the country’s conventional energy industry.

I wrote about Obama’s first divestment dog whistle in “Divestment Du Jour.” You can read more about the campus fossil-fuel divestment movement in my three-part series, and in coverage of divestment controversies at Vassar and Swarthmore.

Reporters ought to force Obama into the open on this issue by asking the White House to expand upon the president’s divestment remarks. Congressional Republicans and potential GOP presidential candidates ought to weigh in as well, condemning Obama’s support for a movement whose radical goal would be repudiated by the vast majority of Americans.

If forced into the open on divestment, Obama will either have to justify his support for an extreme movement whose goal the public is certain to reject, or he will have to back off, sorely disappointing the Millennial voters he’s hoping to energize by stealth. Republicans must press the president to clarify his stand on fossil-fuel divestment.

— Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.  He can be reached at comments.kurtz (at) nationalreview.com.

Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Most Popular

White House

The Trivialization of Impeachment

We have a serious governance problem. Our system is based on separation of powers, because liberty depends on preventing any component of the state from accumulating too much authority -- that’s how tyrants are born. For the system to work, the components have to be able to check each other: The federal and ... Read More
U.S.

‘Texodus’ Bodes Badly for Republicans

‘I am a classically trained engineer," says Representative Will Hurd, a Texas Republican, "and I firmly believe in regression to the mean." Applying a concept from statistics to the randomness of today's politics is problematic. In any case, Hurd, 42, is not waiting for the regression of our politics from the ... Read More
Elections

Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More
Culture

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More