The Corner

Paid Leave: The Left’s Critique of Rubio’s Plan

Senator Marco Rubio arrives for a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing evaluating the Intelligence Community Assessment on “Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections” on Capitol Hill, May 16, 2018. (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)

Senator Marco Rubio has introduced legislation that allows people to finance leave from their jobs when they have new children by accepting reduced Social Security benefits when they retire. In the New York Times, Bryce Covert writes in opposition to the bill. She makes four arguments. I’ll comment on them in order.

First: The plan entails a projected three percent decrease in Social Security benefits per leave taken; Covert argues that reduction would hurt the poor the most. That’s not a good reason to deny low-income workers this option, especially since the Congressional Budget Office projects that Social Security will replace a higher and higher proportion of low-income workers’ incomes.

Second: “The plan also penalizes parents for each child by putting retirement further out of reach each time they take leave.” That’s a screwy way of characterizing the plan, since a) no parent would be forced to participate and b) no parent would see their total Social Security benefits decline because of participation.

Third: The plan “perpetuates the idea that child rearing is an individual, not a collective, responsibility.” Nearly everything about parenthood perpetuates the idea that child rearing is mainly a familial responsibility, since it is one. If we want families to have more economic support from taxpayers as a whole, or think that existing economic policies leave them worse off than they should be, we are free to try to change that without denying families the option of taking some Social Security benefits early. One person who has worked to make those policies more beneficial to parents, by the way, is Senator Rubio.

Fourth: The Rubio plan does not help people who are trying to take time off because of their illness or a family member’s. Perhaps this is a reason to favor Covert’s preferred plan over Rubio’s plan, or to amend Rubio’s plan; it’s not a reason to oppose Rubio’s plan.

Neither separately nor together, then, do the arguments in Covert’s op-ed justify a vote against the bill.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


Jussie Smollett Jokes Declared Off-Limits

The Jussie Smollett story has been declared not fit for jokes. "It's a straight-up tragedy," declares the co-creator of a Comedy Central show, South Side, set in Chicago. Bashir Salahuddin, a former Jimmy Fallon writer, says “The whole situation is unfortunate. Particularly for the city, there’s bigger ... Read More

What The 1619 Project Leaves Out

“The goal of The 1619 Project, a major initiative from The New York Times that this issue of the magazine inaugurates, is to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year,” The New York Times Magazine editors declare. “Doing so requires us to place ... Read More
PC Culture

Courage Is the Cure for Political Correctness

This might come as some surprise to observers of our campus culture wars, but there was a time, not long ago, when the situation in American higher education was much worse. There a wave of vicious campus activism aimed at silencing heterodox speakers, and it was typically empowered by a comprehensive regime of ... Read More
Film & TV

The Movies Take On Limbaugh, Levin, et al.

Oh, good, here’s the lefty British comic Steve Coogan to give us his take on American right-wing talk radio. Let’s all settle in for some deep insights. The comedy-drama is dismally titled Hot Air. No, seriously. That’s what they came up with. Coogan’s Lionel Macomb is introduced to us via his ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Ignorant Comments on Israel

Making the click-through worthwhile: figuring out what President Trump meant when he said Jews who vote for Democrats show “either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty”; examining the data on how American Jews actually feel about Israel; and why Democrats will always find a way or a reason to avert ... Read More