The Corner

Education

Having No Grounds for Complaint, Leftists Smear Speaker as Racist Anyway

Leftist virtue-signaling requires that practitioners not only refuse to listen to anyone who is perceived as an enemy, but also to make up nasty accusations if they can’t find any other mud to throw. A recent trip by Professor Paul Gottfried to Hamilton College to talk about two of his areas of expertise (American conservatism and European fascism) provided some good examples of the academic Left at work. He writes about his experience in a new Martin Center article.

Gottfried isn’t famous or provocative. He’s a retired professor who has written a lot of scholarly books and articles. Neither he nor the Hamilton faculty members who invited him expected any trouble — but they underestimated the capacity for “progressives” to get nasty. A gauntlet of students accosted him before he had said a single word, tossing around epithets and accusations. Nevertheless, both of Gottfried’s talks proceeded without incident, as did his presentation at the Alexander Hamilton Institute. But after he left the campus, trouble began.

Gottfried writes,

Within a few days of my departure, I learned that my visit to Hamilton had stirred up quite a disruption. The Government Department saw fit to send around a statement to the Hamilton community. It said that the faculty members were concerned over “multiple complaints from students about racist remarks allegedly made by Gottfried” in his talks. Nothing I had said could be regarded as “racist” except in that “racist” has become a universal smear for any disagreement with leftist thinking. The statement went on to “unequivocally condemn any and all such racist remarks, written or spoken.”

So a few social-justice-warrior–type students make up allegations of racism and their ideological buddies on the faculty feel compelled to make a big fuss. In a sensible world, that would have been the end of the matter, but we don’t live in a sensible world. Hamilton’s president, David Wippman, felt that he had to say something about the Gottfried Horror, so he penned a letter to the community. Gottfried continues:

Wippman wrote to “address issues of serious concern” over my appearance on campus. “First,” he wrote, “we are a community that values all its members. We want and need to foster a diverse, welcoming, and inclusive environment. . . . Racism, sexism, anti-Semitism, and all other forms of bigotry are anathema to our core values. Claims of racial hierarchy based on spurious notions of genetics are scientifically bankrupt, morally repugnant. I understand, intellectually, morally, and viscerally, the anger and pain members of our community experience when faced with such claims, particularly in the current political climate and historical context.”

Never mind that Gottfried had not in fact said anything that a reasonable person would construe as racism, sexism, anti-Semitism, or bigotry. Wippman couldn’t be bothered to find out if the charges had any validity. Academic leftists can’t be bothered with truth when the feelings of students are involved.

Wippman didn’t even succeed in placating all of the students. Some accused him of being “too tolerant.”

One more bit of damage — the instructor in the first class where Gottfried spoke will apparently lose his position on the faculty. Someone must pay for subjecting Hamilton to the terrors of Paul Gottfried!

He concludes the article with this observation, “One should expect anger and collateral damage whenever you deviate from PC sentiments on college campuses these days.”

Editor’s Note: The headline of this post has been updated.

George Leef is the the director of editorial content at the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal.

Most Popular

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More
Elections

Biden Is Still Underperforming Hillary

On October 20, 2016: Hillary Clinton was up 6.8 in the RealClearPolitics average in Pennsylvania. Today, Biden is up 3.8. (that race only tightened to 2.1 in the last week of 2016.) Clinton was up twelve points in Michigan on that day. Biden is up 7.5 right now. Clinton was up 6.5 in Wisconsin. Biden is ... Read More
Elections

Biden Is Still Underperforming Hillary

On October 20, 2016: Hillary Clinton was up 6.8 in the RealClearPolitics average in Pennsylvania. Today, Biden is up 3.8. (that race only tightened to 2.1 in the last week of 2016.) Clinton was up twelve points in Michigan on that day. Biden is up 7.5 right now. Clinton was up 6.5 in Wisconsin. Biden is ... Read More

Trump: No

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More

Trump: No

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More

Trump: Yes

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More

Trump: Yes

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More
Elections

How Trump Might Be Winning

I’m far too dumb to be able to shed any light on polls, but I do know something about celebrity and I think I can guarantee this: If President Trump wins re-election, Robert Cahaly is going to become very famous very quickly. Who is Robert Cahaly? The chief pollster for the Trafalgar Group, the only major ... Read More
Elections

How Trump Might Be Winning

I’m far too dumb to be able to shed any light on polls, but I do know something about celebrity and I think I can guarantee this: If President Trump wins re-election, Robert Cahaly is going to become very famous very quickly. Who is Robert Cahaly? The chief pollster for the Trafalgar Group, the only major ... Read More