The Corner

Economy & Business

Krugman Misleads on Federal Pay

Paul Krugman (Brendan McDermid/Reuters)

In criticizing President Trump’s decision to withhold a cost-of-living increase for federal workers, Paul Krugman writes:

Federal workers with low levels of education are paid more than their counterparts in the private sector — but do you really want our government to emulate the always-low-wages policies of, say, fast food chains? More educated workers, on the other hand, are paid substantially less than private-sector equivalents, and CBO finds that overall the federal government pays only about 3 percent more than it would if it matched private pay schedules.

Four Pinocchios! An economist with less of a political axe to grind would have specified that federal wages are 3 percent higher, but that wages are only part of compensation. The same CBO report found that federal benefits are 47 percent higher than private-sector levels. Combine wages and benefits, and the average federal employee enjoys a 17 percent compensation premium. Furthermore, “more educated” federal employees are paid less only when we are talking about people with professional degrees and doctorates. Federal employees with bachelors’ and masters’ degrees still receive a premium.

But what about Krugman’s point that the federal government should not pay its less-educated workers the “always-low-wages” found in the private sector? That’s a union talking point that I’m surprised to see an economist repeat. One can be concerned about the low-skill labor market — I certainly am — without supporting special privileges for people with government jobs. All federal employees should receive market-level compensation, and attempts to bolster low-skill wages — with the EITC, for example — should apply economy-wide. Unless you’re a union boss, there is simply no reason to favor public workers over private workers.

Now, across-the-board wage reductions are hardly the best way to reform federal compensation. I would prefer that Congress enact structural changes such as phasing out the FERS annuity, loosening tenure restrictions, and allowing more merit-based pay. Until then, however, withholding the annual pay increase is a reasonable cost-saving measure.

Jason Richwine — Jason Richwine is a public-policy analyst and a contributor to National Review Online.

Most Popular

White House

What Is Hillary Clinton Thinking?

When Homer Simpson looks in the mirror, he sees ripped chest muscles and arms like the trunks of beech trees. When Hillary Clinton looks in the mirror, she sees America’s sweetheart. She thinks: America adores me. She thinks: America already chose me to be president once! She thinks: Everyone is comparing me ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Rod Rosenstein’s Resistance

Rod Rosenstein is even a weasel when repudiating his weasel moves. Here (with my italics) is the deputy attorney general’s non-denial denial of a New York Times report Friday that he brainstormed about ousting President Trump in May 2017: The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect. . . ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Fight for Kavanaugh 

The cynics — or, perhaps more precisely, the realists — believed that the Democrats were playing for time in the hopes of finding another accusation against Brett Kavanaugh. The cynics were right. The New Yorker stooped to publish a shoddy story alleging that Kavanaugh exposed himself to a woman while he ... Read More
White House

Trump Stands By ‘Fantastic’ Kavanaugh

President Trump was supportive of his nominee to the Supreme Court during a radio interview set to be broadcast on Monday morning, in which he characterized Brett Kavanaugh as a “fantastic, fantastic man” and called into question allegations of sexual assault. In the interview — recorded on Sunday, ... Read More