The Corner

Culture

Is Peter Thiel’s Crusade Against Gawker a Threat to Free Speech?

Let me decisively and bravely say, “Maybe.” 

The web is buzzing with the news that PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel bankrolled Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker to punish it for “outing” Thiel ten years ago. Given that Hogan is now sitting atop a $140 million dollar verdict against the gossip site, I’d say that Thiel has indeed gained his vengeance. Thiel is victorious, but is he dangerous?  I have three thoughts.

First, I agree with Eugene Kontorovich. It’s not problematic that Hogan received third-party financing for his case. Virtually every public interest legal organization or activist group finances litigation. There can be great value in third-party financing, and multiple key precedents have been won by lawyers whose bills are paid by someone else. 

Second, not only is third-party financing appropriate in the abstract, it’s also appropriate in this case. Thiel’s desire to protect individual privacy even in the age of the Internet is certainly defensible, and making this case in court represents a justifiable use of his own funds. To borrow the language from Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, if the financed case represents a good faith effort to apply existing law or to extend, modify, or reverse existing law, then I’m fine with the use of private funds even if I often disagree with the legal argument. 

Third, there is still of course a risk of abuse. It would be fairly easy for a wealthy individual or corporation to file a case or series of cases not so much to apply or test legal theories but as a “process-as-punishment” effort to grind media companies (or other foes) into the dust – exhausting their funds and energy in never-ending court battles. In such circumstances, the threat to a culture of free speech is obvious, and the funder’s conduct — while legal — would be destructive.

Thiel’s funds grant him opportunities (not many people can drop fat stacks of cash on someone else’s legal battle) but also carry with them certain civic responsibilities. He could abuse his financial power, but in funding Hogan’s case he stayed safely on the right side of the line.

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

World

Ilhan Omar’s Big Lie

In a viral exchange at a congressional hearing last week, the new congresswoman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar, who is quickly establishing herself as the most reprehensible member of the House Democratic freshman class despite stiff competition, launched into Elliott Abrams. She accused the former Reagan official ... Read More
U.S.

Questions for Those Who Believed Jussie Smollett

The “we reported the Jussie Smollett case responsibly” contention has been blasted to smithereens. Twitter accounts and headlines in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times reported as fact Jussie Smollett’s wildly implausible allegations, and many other journalists did so as ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More
U.S.

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More