The Corner

Politics & Policy

Congress Restores Federalism on State Funding of Abortion

The Senate voted on Thursday to overturn an Obama-administration rule that prohibited states from diverting their Title X funds away from groups that perform abortions, in effect forcing states to fund Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers. The Health and Human Services regulation said states could not use “criteria in their selection of subrecipients that are unrelated to the ability to deliver services to program beneficiaries in an effective manner.”

This formulation made it impossible for states to defund abortion providers, because those clinics are said to “deliver services . . . in an effective manner.” It’s worth noting, too, that the regulation could easily be interpreted as preventing states from funding crisis-pregnancy centers and other clinics that don’t provide abortions.

With this vote, the House struck as much of a blow for federalism as for life. States have long been understood to possess discretionary power over their allocation of Title X funding for public health, and the original HHS rule was an astonishing overreach — another example of bureaucratic agencies attaching strings to states’ money and forcing them to disburse those funds in a government-approved way.

But, of course, yesterday’s vote is instead being cast by progressives and the media as an attack on women’s health, calling it “blocking Planned Parenthood funding,” “stripping Planned Parenthood of Title X funding,” and “a vote that cuts millions in Planned Parenthood funding,” among other choice examples. None of these are even slightly accurate; the vote merely restored the original balance of federalism on state Title X spending.

If the left were to admit that this was a federalism issue — and, more to the point, that the legislation was crafted to curb massive over-regulation from Washington — it would sound much less horrifying to the average American. So, instead, it is portrayed as a direct assault on Planned Parenthood, a group that has garnered sympathy from Americans through its use of false statistics and misleading marketing campaigns.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Do You Want 51 or 52 States Next Year?

“The prospects of statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., have never been greater, but many significant obstacles loom,” The Hill declares. The Constitution declares, “new States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Do You Want 51 or 52 States Next Year?

“The prospects of statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., have never been greater, but many significant obstacles loom,” The Hill declares. The Constitution declares, “new States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction ... Read More

The Arson Party

About that peaceful transfer of power . . . I do not have access to my friend Mario Loyola’s Donald J. Trump super-secret decoder ring, but I am inclined to accept Loyola’s explanation that what President Trump was trying to say, but couldn’t quite manage to say, was the usual witless Trump trolling -- ... Read More

The Arson Party

About that peaceful transfer of power . . . I do not have access to my friend Mario Loyola’s Donald J. Trump super-secret decoder ring, but I am inclined to accept Loyola’s explanation that what President Trump was trying to say, but couldn’t quite manage to say, was the usual witless Trump trolling -- ... Read More
Elections

There Will Be a Peaceful Transfer of Power

The answer to the question, “Will your administration oversee a peaceful transfer of power after the impending election?” is, without exception, “Yes.” It would be better for the United States, and for this administration, if President Trump understood that. One of the more peculiar political dynamics ... Read More
Elections

There Will Be a Peaceful Transfer of Power

The answer to the question, “Will your administration oversee a peaceful transfer of power after the impending election?” is, without exception, “Yes.” It would be better for the United States, and for this administration, if President Trump understood that. One of the more peculiar political dynamics ... Read More