The Corner

Politics & Policy

A Political Problem with Tax Reform

As I note in this Bloomberg View article about the Republican bill, any tax reform that scales back tax breaks is going to create winners as well as losers. It’s no argument against a reform that it raises taxes on some people. We have to ask whether the people who lose out from reform can take the hit, whether the tax breaks they are losing are justified or unjustified, and whether the overall pattern of winners and losers makes sense.

The bill gets a mixed grade on those tests, as I write. But there’s an additional political problem that I didn’t note.

This bill is complicated, and surely a lot of that complication is baked into the enterprise of reforming the tax code. (I do think, however, that the reform is more complicated than necessary.) Even among people who look through its provisions, a large fraction are not going to know if they will pay more or less under the reform. To figure it out they would have to do a lot of work — comparable to, probably more than, the amount of work they have to do each year to figure out how much they owe at tax time. And of course most people are not going to look at the provisions in the first place.

I suspect that a lot of people, when they hear that a tax reform has winners and losers, are going to assume that they will be among the losers even if they aren’t. Or, at least, that they will be “loss averse,” more mindful of the risk of a tax increase than of the opportunity of a tax increase. In part that’s because people are skeptical of politicians’ promises.

If I’m right about this, it means that voters are going to have a bias against nearly any tax reform, even a very well-designed one.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

White House

The Trivialization of Impeachment

We have a serious governance problem. Our system is based on separation of powers, because liberty depends on preventing any component of the state from accumulating too much authority -- that’s how tyrants are born. For the system to work, the components have to be able to check each other: The federal and ... Read More

‘Texodus’ Bodes Badly for Republicans

‘I am a classically trained engineer," says Representative Will Hurd, a Texas Republican, "and I firmly believe in regression to the mean." Applying a concept from statistics to the randomness of today's politics is problematic. In any case, Hurd, 42, is not waiting for the regression of our politics from the ... Read More

In Defense of Tulsi

Some years ago, a liberal-minded friend of mine complained during lunch that Fox News was “stealing” his elderly parents. “They should be enjoying retirement,” he said, noting that they live in a modest but comfortable style with attentive children and grandchildren to enjoy. “But instead,” he sighed, ... Read More

Not Less Religion, Just Different Religion

The Pew Poll tells us that society is secularizing -- particularly among the young -- and who can deny it? That is one reason that the free expression of religion is under such intense pressure in the West. But it seems to me that we aren't really becoming less religious. Rather, many are merely changing that ... Read More