The Corner

Poverty: It’s More Complicated Than You Think

It’s not often I find the New York Times’s analysis of economic questions especially helpful or enlightening, but yesterday I was pleased to see some of the Gray Lady’s staff acknowledge that measuring material poverty is a difficult exercise, and that in many respects the standards we use are flawed — sometimes in very serious ways.

On Monday, the Census Bureau will release a new, alternative measure of poverty that seeks to provide more accurate information on (1) the resources at the poor’s disposal and (2) the financial obligations they have to meet. In anticipation of Monday’s release, the Times article listed a few of the flaws in the now 50-year-old official poverty measure.

Not only does the official poverty measure not account for the billions received by many of America’s poor through various welfare programs and tax credits, but it also fails to account for the full range of expenses incurred by the same people, including the taxes they pay. Nor does the official measure take into account the varying costs of certain fixed expenses (e.g., rent) in different parts of America.

After underscoring the inadequacies of the present official measure, the articles’ authors then explain how some of the fuller measures of poverty that already exist, but which the federal government has generally ignored, provide a somewhat different picture of poverty in America.

Some of the reports using these fuller measures — most of them produced by organizations with no particular ideological ax to grind — claim that black Americans are less poor than previously supposed and that some of the officially poor are, well, not poor. This doesn’t mean that these groups are necessarily well-off. But what is revealing is that, as the Times’ piece states, “virtually every effort to take a fuller view — counting more income and more expenses — shows poverty rising more slowly in the recession than the official data suggests.” And if that is not enough, the article goes on to state that “while the official national measure shows a rise of 9.8 million people, the fuller census measures show a range from 4.5 million to 4.8 million.”

There will be two rejoinders from the left to these observations. One is that any significant increase in poverty is unworthy of America. The second is that, whatever’s one’s quibbles about the ways material poverty is measured, they shouldn’t be used as excuses for simply doing nothing.

In a sense, both these points are true. The problem is anti-poverty policies based upon flawed, out-dated, misleading, and/or one-dimensional measurements are likely to be ineffective in helping to address poverty. They also constitute a misuse of the substantial portion of taxpayer money presently being used to fight poverty. Both the poor and taxpayers deserve better.

— Samuel Gregg is research director at the Acton Institute. He has authored several books including On Ordered Liberty, his prize-winning The Commercial Society, Wilhelm Röpke’s Political Economy, and his 2012 forthcoming Becoming Europe: Economic Decline, Culture, and America’s Future.

Samuel GreggMr. Gregg is the research director of the Acton Institute.

Most Popular

Elections

Biden Lies Again and Again

Joe Biden is a career liar and he lied some more in the debate, for instance when he dismissed the now well-supported New York Post story about Hunter Biden's business dealing as "a Russian plant." There is zero evidence for this. He offered this line: There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said ... Read More
Elections

Biden Lies Again and Again

Joe Biden is a career liar and he lied some more in the debate, for instance when he dismissed the now well-supported New York Post story about Hunter Biden's business dealing as "a Russian plant." There is zero evidence for this. He offered this line: There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said ... Read More
Elections

Biden Wants It Both Ways

This week felt like a month. On the menu today: After President Trump asked, “Would you close down the oil industry?” Biden responded, “I have a transition from the old industry, yes,” and now Biden’s campaign insists the candidate didn’t mean it. Biden also insisted that he “never said I oppose ... Read More
Elections

Biden Wants It Both Ways

This week felt like a month. On the menu today: After President Trump asked, “Would you close down the oil industry?” Biden responded, “I have a transition from the old industry, yes,” and now Biden’s campaign insists the candidate didn’t mean it. Biden also insisted that he “never said I oppose ... Read More

The Pollster Who Thinks Trump Is Ahead

The polling aggregator on the website RealClearPolitics shows the margin in polls led by Joe Biden in a blue font and the ones led by Donald Trump in red. For a while, the battleground states have tended to be uniformly blue, except for polls conducted by the Trafalgar Group. If you are a firm believer only in ... Read More

The Pollster Who Thinks Trump Is Ahead

The polling aggregator on the website RealClearPolitics shows the margin in polls led by Joe Biden in a blue font and the ones led by Donald Trump in red. For a while, the battleground states have tended to be uniformly blue, except for polls conducted by the Trafalgar Group. If you are a firm believer only in ... Read More
Elections

Biden Dusts Off Obama’s Most Famous Lie

"If you like your health care plan, you can keep it," was a promise President Barack Obama often made when selling the Affordable Care Act. It was one of the most significant political lies in recent history, leveled during one of our most contentious policy debates. If Americans knew they might lose their ... Read More
Elections

Biden Dusts Off Obama’s Most Famous Lie

"If you like your health care plan, you can keep it," was a promise President Barack Obama often made when selling the Affordable Care Act. It was one of the most significant political lies in recent history, leveled during one of our most contentious policy debates. If Americans knew they might lose their ... Read More