The Corner

‘Priviledged Duality,’ a.k.a. Violating the Oath of Citizenship

Apropos of the quote from John O’Sullivan in my post below about how Republicans need to encourage immigrants’ adoption of a common American identity as a precursor to political success among them, here’s something from a post by Jorge Ramos of Univision:

But I’ve never ceased to be Mexican. I have two passports, and I vote in elections in both countries. I’m deeply proud of this privileged duality. The best thing about America is its embrace of diversity.

His “privileged duality” is a direct contradiction of the oath of allegiance he took to become a citizen, which begins:

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen

That’s absolutely and entirely renouncing all allegiance to any foreign prince, potentate, etc. Doesn’t sound like privileged duality to me. In fact, it sounds like Ramos lied when he took the oath. And his nonchalance about citizenship is clear from his celebration of “30 years as an American” when, in fact, it’s been 30 years since he came here on a nonimmigrant visa; presumably, he didn’t actually become an American until some years after that.

The oath doesn’t require an immigrant to stop being a fan of his native land, to cut all emotional connection to it — that would be unnatural and unnecessary. But it does demand the severing of any and all political connection. The Supreme Court has prohibited denaturalization in cases where Americans-by-choice violate this oath, as Ramos admits he’s done. Earl Warren himself gave the green light for Congress to place civil or criminal penalties on naturalized citizens who vote in foreign elections and take other actions to violate their oaths. Congress, of course, has done nothing.

And this isn’t just some white-Hispanic ethnic hustler, though Ramos is that — he’s practically the Walter Cronkite of Spanish-language media in the U.S. and thus the prism through which many immigrants see the broader American society with which they otherwise might not have much contact. This is the difficult context within which we must strive — for the good of the republic, first and foremost — to nurture a strong sense of patriotic solidarity among our people, native-born and immigrant. And ongoing large-scale immigration just makes that job harder.

Mark Krikorian — Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular


The Georgia Smear

Back in 2016, when Trump refused to say he’d necessarily accept the result if he lost, we were told that this was a terrible violation of democratic norms. Now, refusing to accept that you lost an election is the highest form of patriotism. Not only are the media and the Left not pressuring Stacey Abrams to ... Read More
PC Culture

The Lonely Mob

Just before the election, an Andrew Gillum intern named Shelby Shoup was arrested and charged with battery after assaulting some college Republicans on the campus of Florida State University. It was rather less exciting than that sounds: She went on a rant about “Nazis” and “fascism” — Gillum’s ... Read More

How Immigration Changes Britain

Almost nothing is discussed as badly in America or Europe as the subject of immigration. And one reason is that it remains almost impossible to have any sensible or rational public discussion of its consequences. Or rather it is eminently possible to have a discussion about the upsides (“diversity,” talent, ... Read More

Sorry, Brian Kemp Still Won

Here was the state of play as of yesterday per the Kemp campaign’s breakdown of publicly available information: As of Saturday, November 10, 2018 (12:00 p.m.) *Information below is public.  Total votes reported: 3,924,658 Kemp: 1,975,162 (50.33%) Abrams: 1,912,383 (48.73%) Metz: ... Read More