The Corner

The Problems With Trump’s Closing Argument

This ad, from Donald Trump, is making the rounds, and I have to admit that it makes a powerful populist statement:

It presents the great and good American people at the mercy of forces outside of their control, wrecking their lives and destroying their futures. They have only this moment and this time to seize control, and transform the nation. It’s textbook populism, and it’s fundamentally false on at least two counts.

First, Donald Trump doesn’t believe any of this. Trump is not a man of the people. He’s a man of the person — himself — and he will do or say what he needs to do or say to attain power. While he surely has certain political impulses or sympathies, he would discard any of them for the sake of personal advantage. At base, there is no true “Trumpism.” There is only Trump, and it’s a mistake to attach too much ideological meaning to one man’s quest for control.

Second, your average American simply isn’t at the mercy of larger forces. It’s not true. The most important factors in the success or failure of any American family’s economic prospects are their own choices. If an American finishes school, gets married, and stay married, the future is bright — even in an age of global competition, relatively free trade, and increased automation. 

The problem is that global competition, free trade, and increased automation also decrease the margin for error at the very moment when American culture is degraded to the point where our errors multiply. But I’m not sure there will ever be a time where the bounty is so great (over the long term, discounting short booms) that libertine or irresponsible personal choices won’t — in the aggregate — create serious economic blowback.

To be sure, there are the individual counter-examples — the married family that struggles or the single mom who makes it big — but in the context of overall cultural reality, no politician can help you nearly as much as you can help yourself. Not even Donald Trump. Any other political message ultimately does more harm than good. 

David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular


Cold Brew’s Insidious Hegemony

Soon, many parts of the United States will be unbearably hot. Texans and Arizonans will be able to bake cookies on their car dashboards; the garbage on the streets of New York will be especially pungent; Washington will not only figuratively be a swamp. And all across America, coffee consumers will turn their ... Read More
National Security & Defense

The Warmonger Canard

Whatever the opposite of a rush to war is — a crawl to peace, maybe — America is in the middle of one. Since May 5, when John Bolton announced the accelerated deployment of the Abraham Lincoln carrier group to the Persian Gulf in response to intelligence of a possible Iranian attack, the press has been aflame ... Read More

The Merit of Merit-Based Immigration

Having chain-migrated his way into the White House and a little bit of political power, Donald Trump’s son-in-law is shopping around an immigration plan. And if you can get past the hilarious juxtaposition of the words “merit-based” and “Jared Kushner,” it’s a pretty good one. As things stand, the ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More
NR Webathon

Socialism Is about Taking, Not Giving

The snakiest of snake-oil pitches goes like this: Give us some of your freedom and we’ll take care of you. Socialists have been making similar claims back as far as Plato. The end result doesn’t have to be Venezuela. It can just be . . . Europe. What’s wrong with Europe? Despite a turn away from ... Read More