The Corner

Education

Professor’s Door Vandalized at Sarah Lawrence College after He Criticizes Ideological Bias

Last month, Samuel Abrams, professor of political science at Sarah Lawrence College, published an op-ed in the New York Times about ideological bias among university administrators. Abrams reported the results of a nationally representative survey of 900 college administrators, which found that liberal staff members outnumbered conservative staff members by a 12-to-1 ratio. Abrams’s article succeeded in generating some thoughtful discussion among both university faculty and education-policy experts interested in viewpoint diversity on college campuses.

Unfortunately, the response at Sarah Lawrence was far different. Shortly after the piece was published, Abrams found threatening messages on his office door demanding that he leave the school; decorations on his door, including pictures of his family, had been torn down. Abrams and several members of his department repeatedly asked Sarah Lawrence College president, Cristle Collins Judd, to condemn the vandalism and express support for free speech.

This did not happen. Instead, Judd sent a campus-wide email that mentioned the importance of free expression but mostly stressed her “commitment to diversity and inclusive excellence.” Even worse, during a private phone conversation, Judd accused Abrams of attacking members of the community. “She said I had created a hostile work environment,” Abrams said in an interview with Reason. 

Judd’s unwillingness to forcefully condemn the vandalism, and her subsequent criticism of Abrams, is immensely disappointing. Abrams has published a number of articles about ideological bias in higher education and has never criticized Sarah Lawrence until this point, and his New York Times article was neither polarizing nor inflammatory. While he did point out some campus events that were ideologically biased, Abrams did not criticize any Sarah Lawrence faculty member or administrator by name.

As I discussed in my previous NRO blogpost about Abrams’s op-ed, ideological bias among university administrators is a worse problem than ideological bias among faculty. Conservative students can often avoid faculty members who are hostile to their beliefs, but administrators exert a tremendous amount of influence over hiring, campus programming, and discipline. Unfortunately, Judd’s response to this campus vandalism indicates that lesson has been lost on her.

 

Michael J. New — Michael J. New is a visiting assistant professor of social research and political science at the Catholic University of America and an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute in Washington, D.C.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

The Second(-Class) Amendment

Editor’s Note: The following is the fourth in a series of articles in which Mr. Yoo and Mr. Phillips will lay out a course of constitutional restoration, pointing out areas where the Supreme Court has driven the Constitution off its rails and the ways the current Court can put it back on track. The first entry ... Read More
World

The Brexit Crisis

After what seem like years of a phony war, British and European Union negotiators finally agreed on the terms of Britain’s departure from the EU earlier this week, and Theresa May announced it in the House of Commons. The deal covers more than 500 pages of legal and bureaucratic prose, and few but the ... Read More
World

The Mad, Mad Meditations of Monsieur Macron

Almost everything French president Emmanuel Macron has said recently on the topic of foreign affairs, the United States, and nationalism and patriotism is silly. He implicitly rebukes Donald Trump for praising the idea of nationalism as a creed in which citizens of sovereign nations expect their leaders to put ... Read More