The Corner

Putin Isn’t a Riddle, Our Presidents Just Haven’t Wanted to Solve Him

Contrary to what many in Washington are suggesting, understanding the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, was never difficult. Three U.S. administrations failed to do it not because of a lack of evidence of his criminality but rather because facing that reality did not fit into their plans.

Putin came to power as the result of an act of terror, the bombing of four Russian apartment buildings in 1999 that claimed 300 lives. It was this act that galvanized Russians behind a new war in Chechnya and turned a former head of the FSB who had never run for office into a national savior. A fifth bomb in the basement of a building in the city of Ryazan, however, was discovered and the persons who planted it were caught. They proved to be not Chechen terrorists but agents of the Federal Security Service (FSB).

American officials have had full access for many years to the overwhelming evidence that the 1999 apartment bombings were a false-flag attack intended to justify a new war in Chechnya and bring Putin to power. They not only ignored this evidence but devoted themselves to making Putin their “friend.” President Bush invited Putin to the Bush family home in Kennebunkport. Obama launched his “reset” policy not because the previous policy was unrealistic, but because U.S. gestures of goodwill had not gone far enough.

Putin is a product of the Communist system which reduced individuals to cogs in the machine of a supposedly infallible state. The result for millions was a complete loss of moral values and an infatuation with power — Putin embodies this.

They were in evidence in 2004 when Russian troops attacked the gymnasium of the school in Beslan with flame throwers and grenade launchers, killing 338 persons, including hundreds of children. The order for that attack, which would have been unthinkable for the government of any Western nation, could have come only from Putin. The attack came an hour after agreement had been reached for negotiations with the Chechen separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov that could have led to an end to the crisis.

The moral legacy of Communism is evident in the massive corruption of Russian leaders who siphon off their country’s wealth dooming it to backwardness and in their readiness to rally the population against an imaginary foreign threat in order to distract attention from their abuses.

A story in this morning’s New York Times about our failure to assess Putin accurately is entitled “Three Presidents and a Riddle Named Putin.”

In fact, there is no riddle. The article would more accurately have been entitled “There are None So Blind as Those Who Will Not See.”

— David Satter is a senior fellow of the Hudson Institute and an adviser to Radio Liberty. He was the first  U.S. correspondent to be expelled from Russia since the Cold War. 

David Satter has written four books about Russia, including, most recently, The Less You Know, the Better You Sleep: Russia’s Road to Terror and Dictatorship under Yeltsin and Putin, now available in paperback. He is the only American journalist to be expelled from Russia since the end of the Cold War.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More
Books

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More