The Corner

Re: Bachmann Pledges Gas. . .

Kate, was Bachmann good enough to tell us how? 

Let’s say she can get rid of the entire federal fuel surcharge. That’s 18.4 cents per gallon, which would get us down to $3.39 a gallon. What’s next?

The U.S. increased its oil production by more than any other country in 2009, and still accounted for six to ten percent of global oil production (depending on how you measure). I think we should drill domestically wherever we can and that that should be a part of any plan to stabilize energy prices, but remember: oil is priced, bought, and sold globally. Is there any evidence, anywhere, that we can tap enough untapped oil and boost global supply enough to move prices to the degree Bachmann promises? Better yet: even if we could, would granting new drilling leases any place they were wanted (including national parks and the like) in 2013 be felt at the pump during a President Bachmann’s first term?

The only policies I can think of that would surely accomplish the $2.00 a gallon target are:

1) The seizure by force and nationalized exploitation of a large proportion of the world’s oil supply.

2) The massive federal subsidization of fuel costs.

3) The fomenting of a second global recession as bad as or worse than the last one, complete with negative global GDP growth. 

Am I missing something?

Let me say again: We should increase domestic production and expand drilling. But not because it will, by itself, cut gas prices in half. It won’t by a long-shot. 

Commenters are already making the point under Kate’s post, and I think there’s truth to it, that this has shades of Obama’s “the rise of the oceans will begin to slow” bit. It’s also unbecoming of a conservative candidate for the presidency in that implies way, way, way, way, way (way) too much economic power in that office. Way too much.

Daniel Foster — Daniel Foster is a former news editor of National Review Online.

Most Popular

White House

Out of Order

A  question in the spirit of Donald Trump’s tweets this morning might be: Who’s trying harder to crash U.S. markets, the president of the United States or the president of China? After Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell didn’t forecast the loosening of monetary policy that Trump craves and China ... Read More
Film & TV

Netflix Debuts Its Obama Manifesto

This week’s widespread media blitz heralding Netflix’s broadcast of its first Obama-endorsed presentation, American Factory, was more than synchronicity. It felt as though U.S. publicists and journalists collectively exhaled their relief at finally regaining the bully pulpit. Reviews of American Factory, a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Capital versus Tucker Carlson

Advertisers do not advertise on Tucker Carlson’s show to endorse the views of Tucker Carlson. They advertise on his show for the same reason they advertise elsewhere: a captive audience — in Tucker’s case, the second-largest one in cable news — might spare thirty seconds of attention that will, they hope, ... Read More
Natural Law

Are Your Sexual Preferences Transphobic?

Last year, a study exploring “transgender exclusion from the world of dating” was published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Of nearly 1,000 participants, the overwhelming majority, 87.5 percent, irrespective of their sexual preference, said they would not consider dating a trans person, ... Read More

R.I.P. David Koch

Making the click-through worthwhile: breaking news that David Koch, a giant of philanthropy and the libertarian movement, has died; a couple of politicians who warn us about climate-change-driven rising oceans and worsening hurricanes pay millions for oceanfront property; an insane decision surrounding a morning ... Read More