The Corner

Re: Chait, Ponnuru & Lieberman

One last point in re the discussion yesterday, from a reader:

Here’s another, slightly different, reason why Chait’s and Ramesh’s rebuttals of Lieberman don’t work:

Chait says that the left focus on Bush, not Bin Laden, because society agrees about Bin Laden, but not Bush.

So apparently the effort is to achieve “agreement?” To persuade? Chait says they “spend most of [their] time debating the point of contention?”

This statement would be plausible if the pronouncements of the left were of the type likely to persuade. But the *persuader* graciously grants that his opponent’s stance is understandable and good-intentioned, but shows that it has missed certain points, and should, on reconsideration, change. The persuader ingratiates himself to those who disagree, but not by much, because he hopes to influence them to drift in his direction.

Apologies to Mr. Chait, but…I’ve seen NONE of that attitude on the left. The left doesn’t attempt to persuade, they vilify. They obviously assume anyone who doesn’t already agree with them never will, and is in fact so benighted as to be beyond reason. The idea that the left is engaged in a campaign to persuade those who disagree with them to reconsider is laughable. “Hitler” is what you call the devil you wish exorcised, not the potential convert you wish to woo.

Persuasion? No, no. The left preaches only, solely, to the converted. And the specific type of preaching is easily recognized: It’s the type of emotional appeal to zealotry the partisan uses just before passing the plate…or that the rabble-rouser uses just before the townsfolk take up pitchforks and torches, and march, shouting, to the house of the hated outsider.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Do You Want 51 or 52 States Next Year?

“The prospects of statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., have never been greater, but many significant obstacles loom,” The Hill declares. The Constitution declares, “new States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Do You Want 51 or 52 States Next Year?

“The prospects of statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., have never been greater, but many significant obstacles loom,” The Hill declares. The Constitution declares, “new States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction ... Read More
Elections

There Will Be a Peaceful Transfer of Power

The answer to the question, “Will your administration oversee a peaceful transfer of power after the impending election?” is, without exception, “Yes.” It would be better for the United States, and for this administration, if President Trump understood that. One of the more peculiar political dynamics ... Read More
Elections

There Will Be a Peaceful Transfer of Power

The answer to the question, “Will your administration oversee a peaceful transfer of power after the impending election?” is, without exception, “Yes.” It would be better for the United States, and for this administration, if President Trump understood that. One of the more peculiar political dynamics ... Read More

The Arson Party

About that peaceful transfer of power . . . I do not have access to my friend Mario Loyola’s Donald J. Trump super-secret decoder ring, but I am inclined to accept Loyola’s explanation that what President Trump was trying to say, but couldn’t quite manage to say, was the usual witless Trump trolling -- ... Read More

The Arson Party

About that peaceful transfer of power . . . I do not have access to my friend Mario Loyola’s Donald J. Trump super-secret decoder ring, but I am inclined to accept Loyola’s explanation that what President Trump was trying to say, but couldn’t quite manage to say, was the usual witless Trump trolling -- ... Read More