Further to yesterday’s post, 2016 presidential nominee Joe Scarborough takes it to the next level: If only Steyn and Goldberg talking about me talking about Mitt preventing me from doing my job weren’t preventing me from doing my job . . .
I use the term “court eunuchs” for the American media because their curiosity doesn’t seem to function. In a week of dramatic and consequential news, nothing seems to arouse them (other than Romney press releases).
For example, the Egyptian president demands the arrest of an obscure American who made an unseen film. And whaddayaknow? Next thing that happens, back in the land of the free, a large posse of heavily armed officers descends on his apartment at midnight so that he can be “voluntarily” taken into custody for alleged “probation violations” — because, as everyone knows, in civilized societies breach-of-probation orders are always served at midnight on a weekend when the dark is so much more conducive to persuading householders to “volunteer.”
Look at Jonah’s post immediately below; look at the picture. What a pity Ambassador Stevens didn’t enjoy the same level of “protection” as Mr. Nakoula. Why, if only the United States could bring the same amount of firepower to bear in its Benghazi compound as it brings to a probation-violation arrest in Cerritos. But it’s all about priorities, isn’t it?
Any curiosity about that? Apparently not, judging from Scarborough’s nothing-to-see-here tweets.
Jim Bennett compares Mrs. Thatcher’s response to the Ayatollah Khomeini’s Rushdie fatwa with Obama’s to the Muslim Brotherhood’s demands. Salman Rushdie had been a vicious critic of the Conservative party and the prime minister — he called her “Mrs. Torture” — but Her Majesty’s Government has provided him with safe houses and Special Branch protection for almost a quarter-century. By contrast, within 72 hours of Morsi’s demands, Mr Nakoula is in a jail cell — “rounded up at midnight by brownshirted men for making a movie that embarrasses El Presidente.”
The vacuum of American global influence is now swallowing the First Amendment. Any curiosity about that, journalists?