The Corner

Re: Miranda and Citizenship

Ramesh, I would think the only credible argument that the Constitution does not require Miranda — at least for any arrest inside the United States — would be made by people whose point is to state what the Constitution requires as an abstract proposition rather than as interpreted by the Supreme Court. Assuming that we accept the premise that the Constitution requires what the Supreme Court says it requires, I don’t see how, after the Dickerson case (which I wrote about here), anyone could contend with a straight face that Miranda is not required.

Don’t get me wrong. I think Dickerson is an awful decision — and, indeed, that Miranda is an awful decision. I’d also rather see a system where a super majority of Congress can overrule bad Supreme Court decisions. But what I think doesn’t matter. The Supreme Court says Miranda is required, period.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Origins of Progressive Agony

What has transformed the Democratic party into an anguished progressive movement that incorporates the tactics of the street, embraces maenadism, reverts to Sixties carnival barking, and is radicalized by a new young socialist movement? Even party chairman Tom Perez concedes that there are “no moderate ... Read More

How Will the Senate Races Break?

How will the Senate races break? We have less public polling to go on than in recent years, so answering that question is harder than ever. But the news is more optimistic for Republicans than it was a month ago.   Waves and Breakers Four years ago, I projected in mid September that if “historical ... Read More

The Media Fell for Elizabeth Warren’s Spin

Do you want to know what media bias looks like? Earlier today, Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren released DNA test results that confirmed that she misled employers, students, and the public about her Native American heritage for years. Bizarrely, all too many members of the media treated the results as ... Read More