The Corner

Re: Mukasey in the Crosshairs

The security problems Jonah and JPod allude to are very real and much overlooked.  Those who’ve participated in the process do not like to talk about them and are appropriately discouraged from doing so — the goal of terrorism being to terrorize, it is a satisfaction that we should not give the enemy.  I discuss this and other practical problems, in this paper (on why we need a National Security Court), including the following observation (footnote 9 beginning on p. 6) about the terror trials of the 1990s, which netted less than three dozen terrorists in eight years: 

Most of the trials … took many months to complete (e.g., the blind sheik case took nine months, the embassy bombing and the first WTC trial took seven months), often at the conclusion of, literally, years of pretrial discovery and court proceedings. Typically, the appeals also take years to complete. (E.g., the embassy bombing trial, completed over six years ago, is still on direct appeal, no doubt with years of habeas challenges ahead assuming the convictions are upheld.) Moreover, even assuming arguendo, and against all indications, that there were appreciably more than three dozen terrorists (a) who could practically have been captured and rendered to the U.S. for trial; (b) as to whom evidence existed that could have been used without irresponsibly compromising national security; and (c) as to whom such evidence would have been sufficient to satisfy the demanding proof hurdles for prosecution; there would of course remain the problem of securing courthouses, jail facilities, and trial participants throughout the United States.

By the way, I am more confident than ever in the need for a National Security Court to deal with terrorism cases:  a truly awful New York Times editorial about Judge Mukasey today refers to it as a “truly awful idea.”

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

It’s a Set-up

In my column yesterday, I contended that the unverifiable sexual-assault allegation against Judge Brett Kavanaugh bore “all the hallmarks of a set-up.” I based that assessment on the patently flimsy evidence, coupled with Senate Democrats’ duplicitous abuse of the confirmation-hearing process. To repeat ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Censure Dianne Feinstein

Regardless of the fate of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, the Senate should censure the ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein. Her deception and maneuvering, condemned across the political spectrum, seriously interfered with the Senate’s performance of its constitutional duty to ... Read More

Are We on the Verge of Civil War?

Americans keep dividing into two hostile camps. It seems the country is back to 1860 on the eve of the Civil War, rather than in 2018, during the greatest age of affluence, leisure, and freedom in the history of civilization. The ancient historian Thucydides called the civil discord that tore apart the ... Read More