The Corner

Re: The Nation as a Caricature of Itself

Kathryn, I’ve always enjoyed Katha Pollitt’s columns but I hadn’t read the one you cited. I was quite surprised to read the opening paragraph, which includes these words: “Senator-elect Rand Paul and incoming Representatives Mike Fitzpatrick and Tim Walberg oppose most common methods of birth control, in vitro fertilization and stem cell research, and join Marco Rubio and Pat Toomey in opposing abortion even for rape or incest; Toomey supports jailing doctors who perform abortions.”

As far as I can tell, the claim about Rand Paul stems from an answer he gave to a pro-life group’s survey. He checked “yes” when asked whether he was “morally and/or medically opposed to chemical abortions, such as RU-486, the abortion pill, and other drugs known to prevent the newly created human being from attaching to his/her mother’s womb (implantation).” Paul also said that he supports a “Life at Conception Act,” which says nothing explicit about any form of contraception but instead “declares that the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being.” In short, Paul has never said (as far as I can tell) that he opposes any form of contraception, let alone most common ones, or IVF. The claim that he does is a strained inference.

NARAL, the pro-abortion group, notes that Fitzpatrick supported the “Right to Life Act”–the same legislation that Paul supported–and claims that it “would ban most common forms of birth control, like the pill, and stem-cell research.” This is, again, a strained inference, not an explicit position of Fitzpatrick. (It is in truth impossible to make any kind of halfway serious argument that the Right to Life Act would ban stem-cell research.)

Walberg supported a “Sanctity of Human Life Act” that authorized Congress to protect all human lives but did not specify how Congress should exercise that authority. That appears to be the basis for the claim about him.

Toomey has explicitly said that he believes abortion should be legal in cases of rape and incest. I am not aware of any comments Rubio has made on the subject.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


Columbia 1968: Another Untold Story

Fifty years ago this week, Columbia students riding the combined wave of the civil-rights and anti-war movements went on strike, occupied buildings across campus, and shut the university down. As you revisit that episode of the larger drama that was the annus horribilis 1968, bear in mind that the past isn’t ... Read More

Only the Strident Survive

‘I am not prone to anxiety,” historian Niall Ferguson wrote in the Times of London on April 22. “Last week, however, for the first time since I went through the emotional trauma of divorce, I experienced an uncontrollable panic attack.” The cause? “A few intemperate emails, inadvertently forwarded ... Read More

Poll Finds Nevada Voters Support School-Choice Programs

According to an April poll, a large number of Nevada voters support school-choice programs. The poll, conducted by Nevada Independent/Mellman, found that 70 percent of voters support a proposal for a special-needs Education Savings Account and 59 percent support expanding the funding for the current tax-credit ... Read More

Microscopic Dots. Let’s Look at Them.

Stuart E. Eizenstat has written a big book on the Carter presidency. (Eizenstat was Carter’s chief domestic-policy adviser. He also had a substantial hand in foreign affairs.) I have reviewed the book for the forthcoming NR. Eizenstat tells the story of a meeting between President Carter and Andrei Gromyko, the ... Read More