The Corner

Re: Obama Violates His Oath

Jonah points out one of the more puzzling aspects of the president’s DOMA announcement: He has now announced that he will be vigorously enforcing a statute that he and his attorney general have concluded is plainly unconstitutional. Of course, most Corner readers probably disagree with the conclusion that DOMA is unconstitutional, but let’s set that aside. If Obama were sincere and correct in his constitutional view, why on earth would he direct his administration to violate the Constitution? The courageous, and correct, view of his constitutional role would be to direct his administration to disregard the law.

The president has no less a role in enforcing the Constitution than the Supreme Court or Congress — his oath of office requires that he, “to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Since Marbury v. Madison, we have accepted the notion that the Supreme Court has the final say in announcing the Constitution’s meaning in particular cases and controversies, but that certainly does not mean that the president has no role, or duty, in determining its meaning.

Presidents are called upon daily to decide the proper meaning of the Constitution where the Supreme Court has not spoken. Indeed, there is a zone of “political questions” that the Supreme Court will never decide, so it is left to the political branches to determine the meaning of the Constitution in all sorts of instances, without input from the courts. That the courts are engaged on this particular issue does not mean that a president is absolved of his constitutional oath. If Obama has made a determination that a validly enacted statute is plainly inconsistent with the Constitution, it would seem that his oath would require him to disregard it.

But Obama wants to have it both ways. He wants to play to his base with a political determination of constitutional meaning, but not infuriate critics who might charge him with being “above the law.” The result is fairly unprecedented. Although Jonah raises the comparison to President Bush’s signing of the bipartisan McCain-Feingold campaign-finance bill, President Bush did not flatly conclude that he had determined parts of the bill to be unconstitutional, only that he had serious reservations about the law’s constitutionality. That may not be a portrait of constitutional courage, but it certainly isn’t the same as concluding that he will sign and enforce a statute that he has concluded is constitutionally indefensible (“despite the availability of professionally responsible arguments”). 

So while Obama’s Justice Department and legal team can take comfort in their superiority to his predecessor, he certainly pays a price in constitutional consistency. 

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

San Francisco Bans Fur Sales

San Francisco has banned the sale of fur. From the CBS-SF story: San Francisco has become the first major U.S. city to ban the sale of fur clothing and products. Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a measure that prohibits the sale of fur clothes, accessories, even souvenirs in stores and ... Read More

For the First Time in Weeks, Relief Sweeps over Austin

Making the click-through worthwhile: The Austin bomber is done in by one of his own devices; some new numbers suggest that a small but significant portion of Trump voters are tiring of the chaos and aren’t showing up to support other Republicans in 2018; and the mixed news for conservatives coming out of the ... Read More

The Baleful Effect of #MeToo on Campus

Remember the series of hurricanes that pounded the Caribbean last summer? Something like that has been occurring on college campuses, as they're hit by one destructive mania after another: diversity, Title IX, anti-speech protests. Now it's the #MeToo Movement. In this Martin Center article, British academic ... Read More
Politics & Policy

A Time for Choosing

This year’s Conservative Political Action Conference was controversial. Invitations to European nationalist populists such as Nigel Farage and Marion Maréchal-Le Pen (the niece of Marine Le Pen) caused many longtime conservatives to question whether they still belong to the conservative movement. Vocal critics ... Read More