The Corner


Andy, those are all good points. Let me offer a comment and a question.

The comment: If we can succeed in stabilizing Baghdad, if the effective use of American force can make the capital a place no longer terrorized by suicide bombers that would be significant both militarily and psychologically.

Right now the honest argument for leaving Iraq is that we have met our match, we have been defeated by our enemies and it is time to recognize that reality (while of course also spinning that reality as “redeployment” or an “exit strategy” or some other euphemism that fools no one).

In other words, stabilizing Baghdad becomes a “proof of concept.” If we can’t do that, we probably can’t do anything much against determined enemies who haven’t the courtesy to wear uniforms, march in formation and abide by the Geneva Accords. By contrast, if we can do that, then surely we can clean the terrorists and insurgents out of other corners of Iraq as well – it’s just a matter of applying lessons learned and resources sufficient to the task.

The question: I agree we should focus on Syria and Iraq. Do we know what specific steps that implies? I assume that in the near term we would not expect to achieve regime change but only to inflict damage, to show – finally – that a price will be paid by those who murder Americans.

Clifford D. May — Clifford D. May is an American journalist and editor. He is the president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a conservative policy institute created shortly after the 9/11 attacks, ...

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

One More Point on McCabe . . .

One point to add to Jonathan Turley’s column about Andrew McCabe, and the glaring double standard of whether an FBI official will face obstruction-of-justice charges if he’s caught lying to an FBI internal investigation. In 2015, McCabe's wife Jill ran for a state senate seat in Virginia and received ... Read More
Politics & Policy

‘We Will Reduce Abortion’

Conor Lamb’s success has revived interest in “I’m personally opposed, but.” It’s a rhetorical convention — a cliché, really — that many Catholic Democrats have resorted to ever since Mario Cuomo popularized it with his speech at Notre Dame in 1984, as Alexandra DeSanctis explained a few days ... Read More


In a recent issue, we published a piece on Dante Della Terza, the great Dante scholar at Harvard (now in his nineties). Today, we have an expanded version on the homepage. After the magazine piece was published, I heard from Mark Helprin, the novelist, military analyst, and political writer. I had no idea he had ... Read More

The Pope Francis Challenge

An unforced error from a Vatican communications office the other day drove me a little something like crazy. The nature of the unforced error is that it is wholly unnecessary and typically distracting. And so it was. Days before, as the fifth anniversary of Pope Francis’s election as pope was approaching, a ... Read More