The Corner

Re: Point of Parliamentary Procedure

Andy, the “House version” of the filibuster is a relatively recent innovation by which individual or groups of congressmen can halt legislation by offering rafts of amendments — sometimes hundreds. Interestingly, it was popularized by conservative Republicans fighting their own leadership on spending (Rep. Mike Pence spoke of this when he was at NR on Monday).

The problem is that, to do this, you’ve got to be under an “open rule.” Every bill is debated under a “rule” that fixes which amendments are germane, sets the debate time for both sides, etc. The all-powerful Rules Committee (always controlled by the majority) passes out a rule for each measure that is then voted on by the Committee of the Whole. These are the sorts of votes on which leadership can bank on party discipline, as they are too opaque and “inside baseball” for the general public to get worked up over (we managed to get NR readers amped about the “deem and pass” rule cooked up for Obamacare, but the MSM barely gave it a second thought).

The basic idea of debate under rules is not especially sinister: It is simply a way to control the abject chaos of the People’s House. But it used to be that lots of bills came out under “open rules” wherein any member in the chamber could move to amend at the appropriate time. Nancy Pelosi’s 111th is the first Congress in history that hasn’t brought a single bill out under an open rule.

I don’t know how much room for the “House filibuster” there would have been on a simple adjournment resolution in any event, but this is certainly not a majority that likes to air out disagreement.

Instead, House GOPers had to try and stop this the old-fashioned way: with floor speeches. Boehner et al. managed to shame 39 Democrats into voting against adjournment. Conversely, Pelosi was able to maintain a simple majority of those present and voting, securing adjournment by a single vote: 210–209.

Most Popular

White House

Trump’s Disgraceful Endgame

President Trump said the other day that he’d leave office if he loses the vote of the Electoral College on December 14. This is not the kind of assurance presidents of the United States typically need to make, but it was noteworthy given Trump’s disgraceful conduct since losing his bid for reelection to ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Disgraceful Endgame

President Trump said the other day that he’d leave office if he loses the vote of the Electoral College on December 14. This is not the kind of assurance presidents of the United States typically need to make, but it was noteworthy given Trump’s disgraceful conduct since losing his bid for reelection to ... Read More
Elections

Our Conspiracy-Minded Subculture

On the menu today: Attorney General William Barr declares that he and the Department of Justice have found no evidence of widespread vote fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election; some Trump fans conclude the attorney general has been a deep-state sleeper all along; and why this country is likely ... Read More
Elections

Our Conspiracy-Minded Subculture

On the menu today: Attorney General William Barr declares that he and the Department of Justice have found no evidence of widespread vote fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election; some Trump fans conclude the attorney general has been a deep-state sleeper all along; and why this country is likely ... Read More