The Corner

Re: Public Opinion about Public Opinion on Abortion

Ramesh makes a number of good points this morning as to why most Americans overestimate the level of public support for legal abortion. I agree that the media is partly to blame. The media often cherry picks individual polls and argues that more and more Americans support abortion rights. However, to properly analyze opinion trends, one should consider the same question asked by the same pollster. For instance, Rasmussen polls show consistently lower “pro-life” sentiment than Gallup polls. Also, many polls indicate strong support for the Roe v. Wade decision. However, many incorrectly think that reversing Roe would ban abortion entirely. Furthermore, some people are even unaware that Roe even dealt with abortion. 

I also think part of the blame involves the pollsters themselves. Polling firms frequently ask whether respondents consider themselves “pro-life” or “pro-choice.” This is likely because up until recently, people were more likely to describe themselves as “pro-choice.” Polling firms ask about broadly supported incremental pro-life laws far less frequently. For instance, since 1995 Gallup has asked respondents to identify themselves as either “pro-life” or “pro-choice” over 35 times. In that same timespan, they have asked about waiting periods before abortions three times and parental-involvement laws four times.

Pro-life groups have responded by commissioning their own surveys. Last summer NRLC commissioned a poll which showed strong public support for the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. The Chiaroscuro Foundation commissioned a poll in February which found many aspects of Governor Cuomo’s Reproductive Health Act were unpopular with New York residents. The Knights of Columbus also frequently conducts polls on abortion that offer a range of responses beyond “pro-life” and “pro-choice.” These polls nicely show that incremental pro-life laws enjoy broad support and that majorities of Americans oppose abortion in most circumstances.

— Michael J. New is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Michigan — Dearborn, a fellow at the Witherspoon Institute, and an adjunct scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Follow him on Twitter @Michael_J_New.

Michael J. New is a visiting assistant professor of social research and political science at the Catholic University of America and an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute in Washington, D.C.

Most Popular


Jussie Smollett Jokes Declared Off-Limits

The Jussie Smollett story has been declared not fit for jokes. "It's a straight-up tragedy," declares the co-creator of a Comedy Central show, South Side, set in Chicago. Bashir Salahuddin, a former Jimmy Fallon writer, says “The whole situation is unfortunate. Particularly for the city, there’s bigger ... Read More

What The 1619 Project Leaves Out

“The goal of The 1619 Project, a major initiative from The New York Times that this issue of the magazine inaugurates, is to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year,” The New York Times Magazine editors declare. “Doing so requires us to place ... Read More
PC Culture

Courage Is the Cure for Political Correctness

This might come as some surprise to observers of our campus culture wars, but there was a time, not long ago, when the situation in American higher education was much worse. There a wave of vicious campus activism aimed at silencing heterodox speakers, and it was typically empowered by a comprehensive regime of ... Read More
Film & TV

The Movies Take On Limbaugh, Levin, et al.

Oh, good, here’s the lefty British comic Steve Coogan to give us his take on American right-wing talk radio. Let’s all settle in for some deep insights. The comedy-drama is dismally titled Hot Air. No, seriously. That’s what they came up with. Coogan’s Lionel Macomb is introduced to us via his ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Ignorant Comments on Israel

Making the click-through worthwhile: figuring out what President Trump meant when he said Jews who vote for Democrats show “either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty”; examining the data on how American Jews actually feel about Israel; and why Democrats will always find a way or a reason to avert ... Read More