The Corner

Re: Re: Miranda and Citizenship

Andy, I agree that courts are legally obligated to follow the Miranda rule (and thus that police officers must usually give suspects Miranda warnings) simply because the Supreme Court has issued its erroneous rulings. I just think it’s worth pointing out that it is not at all clear the Court got the law right at a time when the subject is in the news and the rightness of the decisions is being taken for granted.

I think, for example, that a reasonable reading of Glenn Beck’s comment that not reading the Miranda warnings to Faisal Shahzad would shred the Constitution is that Beck believes that the Constitution requires Miranda warnings–indeed, that it is obvious that it requires them. He’s wrong.

(Paul Cassell, who worked hard to get Miranda effectively overruled, makes the point I complained conservatives weren’t making in the Seattle Times. Thanks to reader E.S. for the pointer.)

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


The Left, the Wall, the Truth

Democrats and others on the left offer three reasons for their opposition to building a wall on America's southern border. 1. A wall is ineffective. 2. A wall is too expensive. 3. A wall is immoral. Each one is false, so false as to constitute lies. So, the only question is: Do Democrats and others on ... Read More