The Corner

Re: Re: Senate Con Job

Avik Roy’s post is specious. I try not to do the RINO thing since it gives Republicans too much credit: Being a Republican nowadays does not have much to do with favoring limited, constitutional government. So to say someone is a Republican “in name only” is to say nothing. “Racist,” on the other hand, is a real slander.

Even if Avik were correct that “RINO” and “racist” were being used equally freely by, respectively, conservatives and “liberals” (I think he means “leftists”), so what? As an epithet, RINO really means “conservative in name only”; many who are called RINOs are actually delighted to have others distance them from conservative philosophy without having to renounce it themselves. On the other hand, no one likes to be called a racist.

I’d also be more persuaded if Avik were more even-handed in his criticism. He faults supporters of defunding Obamacare for ignoring “serious arguments” against their position. I haven’t ignored them – I’ve tried to address them. One can disagree, but to say it’s all name-calling is absurd. What’s more, the main proponents of the defunding position have been accused of running a con job. I can understand the argument against the defunding strategy, but why attack the proponents’ good faith? We now know that Republican senators who are attacking the defunding strategy were embracing it only six months ago. Now, when it’s time to stand up and be counted, they pretend that six months ago never happened. How is that not a con job?

Ramesh, I don’t know Senator Corker – never met him. So I can’t say whether I’d like him or not – as if that were relevant to anything. I do know that I don’t like the notion of our government’s providing material support to al-Qaeda terrorists, something that Senator Corker is prepared to overlook. And I know I don’t like it when a senator votes for something (like defunding Obamacare) when the vote is obviously symbolic but then, six months later, not only positions himself to vote against what he used to tell us he was for, but portrays his prior position (which he obviously hopes no one notices he recently held) as moronic.

While I disagree with Republicans who oppose the defunding strategy, I don’t think the calculation that there may be more to lose than to gain is frivolous. I just think the people who’ve made that calculation should have been honest about it from the start. Instead, they voted to defund Obamacare until . . . it mattered. Now, they mock the defunding position – the position they purported to hold – as theater. This is what nauseates people about Washington (and conservatives about Republicans).

The point is not that Senate Republicans are “taking a different view from Andy.” It’s that Senate Republicans are taking a different view from the one they themselves took six months ago, now that it is time to be accountable for that view. Ramesh says he’s “not sure” such gamesmanship makes one “a Washington game-player.” I am sure.

Most Popular

PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More
Film & TV

Joker: An Honest Treatment of Madness

When I saw that the New York Times and The New Yorker had run columns berating the new Joker movie, criticizing it not simply on cinematic grounds but instead insisting that the film amounted to a clandestine defense of “whiteness” in an attempt to buttress the electoral aim of “Republicans” — this is a ... Read More

The Democrats’ Disastrous CNN LGBT Town Hall

A few days after Donald Trump committed the worst foreign-policy blunder of his presidency by betraying America’s Kurdish allies in northern Syria, former vice president Joe Biden, the elder statesman and co-frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary, was on a national stage talking to CNN’s primetime ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More