The Corner

Re: Republicans and Spending

Ramesh has been consistent on this approach to earmarks, but I humbly disagree. I find earmarks to be the sell-out which brings about big legislative horrors. They are akin to what we all know and have experienced in our own lives: people deep-sixing their principles, friendships, jobs, and much more for relative chump change or a short ride in the back seat of a Chevy. John Q. Public is making six figures a year, but risks his job by stealing office paper, putting in for expenses that are personal (cabs to a date, dry cleaning, you name it). Why would someone risk a well-paying job over a few bucks? It happens every day. Why would someone risk a marriage for a one-night stand? It happens every night. Why would a Senator risk his political principles — or his party’s reputation for being opposed to excessive government spending — for a federally funded traffic light on Main Street? It happens all the time.

Granted, at the bottom of the ledger, earmarks are anecdotal as a percentage of federal spending. But they are the bribe that seals the deal on big-funding bills, that causes the sell-out of reputation and principle, personal and partisan. The influence of earmarks far outpaces their size in accumulated dollars. Their consequence is a bigger and more centralized government. That’s why opposing them should be a conservative priority.

Our model on fighting excessive spending should be the NYPD strategy under Bratton and Giuliani: address broken windows and turnstile-jumping, and watch murders and rapes decline. Stop the five-figure earmarks and we’ll have a better chance at stopping the ten-figure bills they enable.

As Kitty Kalen put it best, musically: Little Things Mean a Lot.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

The Second(-Class) Amendment

Editor’s Note: The following is the fourth in a series of articles in which Mr. Yoo and Mr. Phillips will lay out a course of constitutional restoration, pointing out areas where the Supreme Court has driven the Constitution off its rails and the ways the current Court can put it back on track. The first entry ... Read More
PC Culture

The ‘White Privilege’ Canard

Consider two Americans. One is named Mike. Mike is a straight white Christian male from a decaying industrial city in Ohio or Michigan. He never knew his father. His mother is hooked on painkillers. His home life isn’t great. Mom’s various boyfriends enjoy smacking him in the face. He gets passed around to a ... Read More
World

The Mad, Mad Meditations of Monsieur Macron

Almost everything French president Emmanuel Macron has said recently on the topic of foreign affairs, the United States, and nationalism and patriotism is silly. He implicitly rebukes Donald Trump for praising the idea of nationalism as a creed in which citizens of sovereign nations expect their leaders to put ... Read More
Elections

The White Plantation

There are two ugly and stupid lines of “thought” — it is generosity to call this that — in American politics that are inseverable, each being the inverted form of the other: the proposition that black Americans are held hostage on a Democrat-run “plantation” where they exchange their moral and ... Read More