The Corner

Re: Republicans and Spending

Ramesh has been consistent on this approach to earmarks, but I humbly disagree. I find earmarks to be the sell-out which brings about big legislative horrors. They are akin to what we all know and have experienced in our own lives: people deep-sixing their principles, friendships, jobs, and much more for relative chump change or a short ride in the back seat of a Chevy. John Q. Public is making six figures a year, but risks his job by stealing office paper, putting in for expenses that are personal (cabs to a date, dry cleaning, you name it). Why would someone risk a well-paying job over a few bucks? It happens every day. Why would someone risk a marriage for a one-night stand? It happens every night. Why would a Senator risk his political principles — or his party’s reputation for being opposed to excessive government spending — for a federally funded traffic light on Main Street? It happens all the time.

Granted, at the bottom of the ledger, earmarks are anecdotal as a percentage of federal spending. But they are the bribe that seals the deal on big-funding bills, that causes the sell-out of reputation and principle, personal and partisan. The influence of earmarks far outpaces their size in accumulated dollars. Their consequence is a bigger and more centralized government. That’s why opposing them should be a conservative priority.

Our model on fighting excessive spending should be the NYPD strategy under Bratton and Giuliani: address broken windows and turnstile-jumping, and watch murders and rapes decline. Stop the five-figure earmarks and we’ll have a better chance at stopping the ten-figure bills they enable.

As Kitty Kalen put it best, musically: Little Things Mean a Lot.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Making Sense of the Iran Chaos

One would prefer that correct decisions be made according to careful, deliberate plan. But a correct decision made impulsively, through a troubling process, is still nonetheless correct, and so it is with Donald Trump’s decision to refrain from military action against Iran. The proposed strike would represent a ... Read More
U.S.

In Defense of Coleman Hughes

Picture the scene: A young man walks into a congressional hearing to offer witness testimony. His grandfather was barbarically brutalized by people who are now long dead. The nation in which he resides built its wealth of his grandfather’s brutalization. The question: Should his fellow citizens pay the young ... Read More
Education

College Leaders Should Learn from Oberlin

Thanks to their social-justice warrior mindset, the leaders of Oberlin College have caused an Ohio jury to hit it with $44 million in compensatory and punitive damages in a case where the school couldn't resist the urge to side with its “woke” students against a local business. College leaders should learn ... Read More
Elections

Joe and the Segs

Joe Biden has stepped in it, good and deep. Biden, if he has any hope of ever being elected president, will be dependent on residual goodwill among African Americans from his time as Barack Obama’s loyal and deferential vice president — so deferential, in fact, that he stood aside for Herself in 2016 even ... Read More
Film & TV

Toy Story 4: A National Anthem

The Toy Story franchise is the closest thing we have to an undisputed national anthem, a popular belief that celebrates what we think we all stand for — cooperation, ingenuity, and simple values, such as perpetual hope. This fact of our infantile, desensitized culture became apparent back in 2010 when I took a ... Read More