The Corner

Re: On Romney, Obama, and Anglo-Saxons

Charles — I think you make all good and right points re this Anglo-Saxon business. But my reaction is a lot simpler: It’s a stupid controversy. If the aide said it — I love the Telegraph, and I love the Brits, but sometimes British papers are a little loosey-goosey with quotes — my hunch is that he (or she) meant to generically pander to the U.K. and misused a term in good faith. As you note, people often use “Anglo-Saxon” to mean British. But they also sometimes use it to sound knowledgeable and sophisticated. They sometimes use it as a placeholder for the “Anglo-American” tradition, or in reference to the “English-speaking peoples” (a.k.a. the Anglosphere) etc.

When I read the quote I simply smell malaprop. 

“We are part of an Anglo-Saxon heritage, and he feels that the special relationship is special,” the adviser said of Mr Romney, adding: “The White House didn’t fully appreciate the shared history we have”.

The bits about our “shared history” and “special relationship” strike me as wholly un-racial and in reference to a longstanding complaint about Obama snubbing the Brits (something, by the way, Bush was preparing to do before 9/11). It should not shock anyone, however, that Obama’s troops would try to turn it racial or that a British paper (or any paper) might try to gin up a controversy to sell papers. 

Most Popular

White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More
White House

Nikki Haley Has a Point

Nikki Haley isn’t a Deep Stater. She’s not a saboteur. She wouldn’t undermine the duly elected president, no siree! That’s the message that comes along with Haley’s new memoir With All Due Respect. In that book, she gives the politician’s review of her career so far, shares some details about her ... Read More