The Corner

Re: Security, Extremism and Terrorism

In his thought-provoking piece on the homepage today, Bishop Nazir-Ali makes some useful refinements to the points raised by British prime minister David Cameron in his recent speech on multiculturalism. Not all are pertinent to the United States — where, for example, Christianity is not the country’s established religion — but some are, such as the importance of distinguishing moderate Muslims from extremists. Nazir-Ali explains: “By moderate Muslims we do not mean those who are lukewarm in the practice of their faith, but those who interpret it to enable peaceful coexistence and respect for fundamental freedoms.”

Many U.S. policymakers have argued that Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood is a “moderate Islamic” group. While in recent times Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood has eschewed violent tactics and supported elections, the writings of its leaders (see here) have long promoted a governing vision that is radical. Even current writings aimed at winning American support during this pivotal time are hardly reassuring. Abdel Moneim Abou el-Fotouh, a prominent and long-term member of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s “Guidance Council,” recently argued in a Washington Post op-ed that the Muslim Brotherhood is an exemplar of “moderation” because it has adopted nonviolent tactics. He also reaffirmed support for Islamic law in Egypt and waxed euphoric about its virtues: “Sharia is a means whereby justice is implemented, life is nurtured, the common welfare is provided for, and liberty and property is safeguarded.” This utopic portrayal neglects to mention individual freedoms of expression and religion, or equal rights under the law for religious minorities — these omissions should raise a red flag.

American policymakers should not support or promote Egypt’s various political movements and parties until they have ascertained that Bishop Nazir-Ali’s “moderation” litmus test is met. Without the unqualified embrace of fundamental freedoms concerning religion and expression, no constitution can be considered “democratic,” nor any political party “moderate.”

Nina Shea is director of the Hudson Institute’s Center on Religious Freedom.

Nina Shea — Nina Shea is the director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom.

Most Popular

U.S.

Political Theatrics

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including all you whippersnappers under the age of 50), I’m writing this from somewhere over the Atlantic. At least I hope that’s ... Read More
World

The Real Reasons American Evangelicals Support Israel

It never fails. Whenever a Republican president makes a controversial or contentious move to support Israel -- such as moving the American embassy to Jerusalem, or yesterday’s decision to recognize Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights -- you’ll see various “explainers” and other stories that purport ... Read More
White House

Mueller Report Delivered to Attorney General

Special Counsel Robert Mueller on Friday evening delivered a report to attorney general William Barr detailing his nearly two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion with the Trump campaign. Barr will now be tasked with deciding what information from the report ... Read More