The Corner

Re: Shoeless

The grapevine tells me that some think Candace Bushnell should not be described as a “progressive female” since she is an active Republican (and I can see from the old rudimentary Google search that she gave a grand to the Al D’Amato campaign in 1998). Clearly, you can be quite liberal and still be Republican. (Ask Arlen Specter.) But I meant she is certainly surfing on top of the wave of the sexually progressive/sleazy. I also meant to mock the Manolo materialism of her milieu.

Tim GrahamTim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center, where he began in 1989, and has served there with the exception of 2001 and 2002, when served ...
Exit mobile version