The Corner

Re: Undercover or Entrapment?

Michael: I’m not sure I agree with you (and by extension Ira Stoll) in finding O’Keefe’s techniques unethical for a journalist. This is what the FBI does to nail corrupt politicians — they pose as bona fide campaign contributors, and film meetings with politicians trying to make the campaign contribution a direct quid pro quo for sponsoring legislation, etc. It has been used in several states to convict legislators.

I watched this up close in California in the late 1980s in what was known as “shrimp scam” — the FBI posed as a shrimp company that wanted legal changes to do business in California. The irony, as I noted at the time, is that had the shrimp company been a real company, they’d have been quite satisfied with the service they received from the legislators they contributed to (mostly Republicans — rumor had it that their real target, Speaker Willie Brown, was too smart to get caught up in the net), all of whom said they supported the legislation on the merits.

Moreover, much of the method of 60 Minutes over the years has been based on deception. The old pros like Mike Wallace work you over to make you feel like he is your best buddy, thereby getting you to say incautious things that, when properly edited, make you look bad. This seems to me as questionable as anything O’Keefe does.

Anyone remember when Mike Wallace got stung for saying in an interview that “Blacks and Hispanics were too busy eating watermelons and tacos to read the fine print on their insurance policies”? That came about because the person who was the target of Wallace’s story secretly videotaped the whole interview himself, and released the whole thing to the press before the 60 Minutes story aired. Wallace was going to edit out that part, which, like O’Keefe’s fake Muslim Brotherhood folks, was intended to elicit embarrassing comments from the target. (I got to know the fellow back in the 1980s.) 60 Minutes actually tried to bargain with the guy to keep the tape from being released by suggesting they’d go easier on him in the story. But the target wouldn’t deal.

One difference between O’Keefe and 60 Minutes is that O’Keefe releases the entire, un-edited tapes. Seems to me he is more ethical than 60 Minutes and the other networks in this regard.

By the way, people should follow the example of the fellow who nailed Mike Wallace: Always run your own videotape of a media interview. Might come in handy.

Most Popular

PC Culture

‘White Women’ Becomes a Disparaging Term

Using “white men” as a putdown is no longer extreme enough for the Left. Now it is moving on to doing the same for “white women.” How rapidly this transpired. It was less than two years ago that the approximately 98.7 percent of white women working in media who were openly rooting for Hillary Clinton ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The World Keeps Not Ending

We were not supposed to have made it this far. George Orwell saw night descending on us in 1984. Orwell was, on paper, a radical, but in his heart he was an old-fashioned English liberal. He dreamed of socialism but feared socialists. He feared them because he knew them. I was in the sixth grade in 1984, but I ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Beatification of Beto

The media’s treatment of Texas Democratic candidate Beto O’Rourke wasn’t the most egregiously unfair coverage of the past year -- that would be the treatment of Brett Kavanaugh -- but it ranks among 2018’s most annoying. The endless glowing profiles of O’Rourke in every publication from Vanity Fair to ... Read More
Culture

A Free People Must Be Virtuous

Dear Reader (Even those of you who didn’t seem to notice or care that I failed to file this “news”letter on Friday), So I’m sitting here at Gate C6 at O’Hare waiting for my flight home. I am weary, pressed for time, in desperate need of a shower, and filled with a great sense of dread for the work ... Read More