The Corner

Re: Unreason Enthroned

Derb: I’m not looking to prolong or protract a fight on this, and I know you have serious chops on this subject as I’ve seen you in action, but your reply to my demurral is unpersuasive.  Why the worry about unreason in the sciences?  Is not the problem of unreason in the social sciences and the humanities much much worse?  And what, exactly, is the best course for combating feminist theorists (to pick out just one tendentious example) in the intellectual world?  Hardly a purge or a blacklist, but rather the painstaking work of refutation (bless you, Christina Sommers), scorn, and, above all, benign neglect, as I can perceive that few real students, not otherwise predisposed, are persuaded by the variety of postmodern nonsense the radicals pass out in the classroom.  

Your comment that “Most working scientists see themselves as clearing a small patch of light in a great glowering dark forest of unreason” seems oddly out of line with public esteem for science and scientists.  The scientific community takes it slings and arrows, but hardly seems as beleaguered as, say, religious people.  It is precisely the occasional air of scientists as some kind of semi-official clerisy, which I think your post unwittingly bolsters, actually gives rise to some of the public backlash against science that occurs from time to time.  And unlike the social sciences and the humanities, the idea that the ID movement is somehow, someday going to capture a dominant position analogous to the postmodernists/deconstructionists who have wrecked nearly every English department in higher education strikes me as fanciful, if not ludicrous.  It seems to me that having the consensus position persistently challenged, even if by a supposedly fringe ideology, is a healthy thing, just as the ideological challenge of Marxism/Communism compelled America to reacquire and sharpen its own understanding of its founding principles after decades of desuetude and rejection (by liberals).  It seems to me the attitude should be “bring it on,” not “shut it down.”

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

It’s the Stock Market, Stupid

Before going any further, I must say that I don’t believe Protectionist Donald really will go all the way with his present attempt to strangle global trade. I believe that the end run will be quite similar to what it was with the steel and aluminum tariffs — which is to say, a photo op in the Oval Office. ... Read More

Ten Things that Caught My Eye Today (March 23, 2018)

I send out a free weekly e-mail newsletter that typically goes out Saturday mornings and includes WFB flashbacks, Firing Line videos, upcoming events, and some of what I’ve been up to. Sign up here. 1. Cardinal Timothy Dolan in the Wall Street Journal: Talking about New York, he noted: 2. The Guardian on the ... Read More
National Review

Palm Sunday with WFB

The wonderful National Review Institute forum in New York City last month, held on the tenth anniversary of Bill Buckley’s death -- but truly a celebration of his life and legacy -- was captured by the good folks at C-SPAN, who now tell us that two panels of the forum will be broadcast this Sunday on C-SAN 3. ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Sliming of Bari Weiss

If you follow at all the ideological war that’s erupted around the New York Times editorial page, then you know Bari Weiss. It’s too much to call Bari conservative. A better description might be heterodox. On some issues, particularly social issues and immigration, she’s a woman of the Left. On others — ... Read More
Politics & Policy

How the Nazis Used Gun Control

The perennial gun-control debate in America did not begin here. The same arguments for and against were made in the 1920s in the chaos of Germany’s Weimar Republic, which opted for gun registration. Law-abiding persons complied with the law, but the Communists and Nazis committing acts of political violence did ... Read More