The Corner

Re: ‘The U.S. Military Approves Killing Children’

I agree with what David French writes here on the war in Afghanistan and the tangled “legal architecture” it has born that constricts our troops. The Military Times has a more balanced take on the issue of children on the battlefield in this recent piece titled, “Some Afghan Kids Aren’t Bystanders.” An excerpt:

When Marines in Helmand province sized up shadowy figures that appeared to be emplacing an improvised explosive device, it looked like a straightforward mission. They got clearance for an airstrike, a Marine official said, and took out the targets.

It wasn’t that simple, however. Three individuals hit were 12, 10 and 8 years old, leading the International Security Assistance Force in Kabul to say it may have “accidentally killed three innocent Afghan civilians.”

But a Marine official here raised questions about whether the children were “innocent.” Before calling for the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System mission in mid-October, Marines observed the children digging a hole in a dirt road in Nawa district, the official said, and the Taliban may have recruited the children to carry out the mission.

The incident underscores a continuing problem across Afghanistan. The use of children by the Taliban — through recruitment and as human shields — complicates coalition forces’ efforts to eliminate enemy fighters from the battlefield without angering civilians.

The New York Times reported that the dead children’s family members said they had been sent to gather dung, which farmers use for fuel. Taliban fighters were laying the bombs near the children, who were mistakenly killed, they said.

Regardless, it’s one of many times the children have been involved in the war. In a case this year, Afghan National Police in Kandahar province’s Zharay district found two boys, ages 9 and 11, with a male 18-year-old carrying 1-liter soda bottles full of enough potassium chlorate to kill coalition forces on a foot patrol.

“It kind of opens our aperture,” said Army Lt. Col. Marion “Ced” Carrington, whose unit, 1st Battalion, 508th Parachute Infantry Regiment, was assisting the Afghan police. “In addition to looking for military-age males, it’s looking for children with potential hostile intent.”

If “war is hell,” what do we call war that includes “looking for children with potential hostile intent?”

When I interviewed ABC’s Jake Tapper about his new book, The Outpost: A Tale of Eight Fallen Heroes, I asked them if the troops in Afghanistan knew the mission. Tapper included this response from an officer currently serving in Afghanistan in his answer:

I can’t speak for everyone, but I know what the mission is. It’s to train the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and GIRoA [the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan] (to the extent we can) to take over security and government operations when we’re gone. I think the public 2014 deadline has pros and cons. For instance, it kind of lets GIRoA and the ANSF know they need to get it together soon, because we don’t plan on sticking around forever. It also lets the Taliban know, “Hey, we’ll be out of here soon.” Do I think 2014 is enough time for the ANSF and GIRoA to stand on their own? No. But then again, they’ve had about nine years or so now, so the question is “Will they ever be ready?”



Most Popular


Weirdo O’Rourke

Friends of the young Bill Clinton and Barack Obama spoke of the special glow of promise they had about them, even back in their early twenties. Angels sat on their shoulders. History gave them a wink and said, “Hey, good lookin’, I’ll be back to pick you up later.” Robert O’Rourke? Not so much. He ... Read More

McCain at Annapolis

President Trump has been doing a lot of tweeting today -- against TV programs, companies, and other things that have incurred his displeasure. These tweets make for interesting reading. One of them is this: So it was indeed (just proven in court papers) “last in his class” (Annapolis) John McCain that sent ... Read More