The Corner

Realist Utopianism

Do all of Iraq’s neighbors seek a stable, peaceful Iraq?  Many realists, from Kofi Annan to James Baker to Barack Obama, seem to think so.  Says Annan, “An Iraq at peace is in the interest of all countries in the region, including Iran and Syria.”  And Obama, “Neither Iran nor Syria want to see a security vacuum in Iraq filled with chaos, terrorism, refugees and violence….”  Where does this assumption, upon which all the calls for engagement derive, come from?  The ether?  Neither the actions of Tehran nor Damascus provide any evidence that Iraqi security or stability has been their goal.  And the idea that, after telegraphing how much we want to withdrawal, either capital would take into account our interests is, at the least, dangerously naïve.  The idea that we should entrust our national security to the good word of Mahmoud “A world without America” Ahmadinejad or Bashar al-Assad is a fiction that only Foggy Bottom could dream up.

Michael Rubin — Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, senior lecturer at the Naval Postgraduate School’s Center for Civil-Military Relations, and a senior editor of the Middle East ...

Most Popular

PC Culture

The New, New Anti-Semitism

The old anti-Semitism was mostly, but not exclusively, a tribal prejudice expressed in America up until the mid 20th century most intensely on the right. It manifested itself from the silk-stocking country club and corporation (“gentlemen’s agreement”) to the rawer regions of the Ku Klux Klan’s lunatic ... Read More

The Left, the Wall, the Truth

Democrats and others on the left offer three reasons for their opposition to building a wall on America's southern border. 1. A wall is ineffective. 2. A wall is too expensive. 3. A wall is immoral. Each one is false, so false as to constitute lies. So, the only question is: Do Democrats and others on ... Read More