The Corner

Recovering the Melting Pot

I hope you didn’t miss the weekend essay in this weekend’s Wall Street Journal. It was NR’s own Reihan Salam offering a preview of his utterly extraordinary new book, which will be published tomorrow and you can order today. (He even got the Journal to publish baby pictures of himself, which must have involved a peculiar conversation.)

I’m sure that part of the reason I like the book is that my view of immigration is very much like Reihan’s, and has been influenced by his over the years. We’ve even written about it together, including here at NR. But I don’t just recommend his book because it makes an argument I agree with. I recommend it because it makes a kind of argument that our society needs more of: an argument genuinely intended to persuade, and therefore one that begins from the assumption that everyone on all sides of the immigration debate is basically well intentioned and moved by serious concerns, and that proceeds to offer ideas and reasons for supporting those ideas that treat readers seriously and that acknowledge the unavoidable need for accommodation in a free society.

A book like this can move the needle, but not so much by persuading a mass audience and moving elections or persuading just the right politicians and moving policy. It can move the needle by redefining the boundaries of legitimacy in a public debate that suffers from excessively narrow bounds on all sides. Reihan is extremely well suited to performing this tough task, and the book he has written is a model of how.

You really ought to read it.

Yuval Levin is the director of social, cultural, and constitutional studies at the American Enterprise Institute and the editor of National Affairs.

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More