The Corner

Politics & Policy

Red States, Blue States, and Taxes

A common criticism of the Republican tax bill is that by limiting the current deductions for state and local taxes and mortgage interest, it is punishing Democratic states and voters. (The House bill repeals the deduction for state and local sales and income taxes and caps the deduction for property taxes at $10,000; it ends the mortgage deduction for second homes and caps the deduction for new homes at $500,000 of loan value.)

The fact that these tax increases will fall most heavily on “blue” parts of the country is obviously not an accident. Republicans think they need to limit some deductions to make up some of the lost revenue from other parts of tax reform, and doing that in a way that minimizes the pain to their own constituents is bound to appeal to them.

But I’d push back on the claim of “weaponization” for three reasons. First, Republicans have wanted to get rid of the state-and-local tax deduction for a long time, even when it had a less partisan incidence. The Reagan administration tried to kill it and failed, partly because there were more blue-state Republican congressmen then. The mortgage-interest deduction is a perennial target of tax reformers left and right. There are good arguments beyond hurting Democratic voters to take these steps.

Second, the plan includes some elements, admittedly smaller ones, that tend to help blue states disproportionately. Ending the alternative minimum tax, as the Republican bill does, disproportionately helps people in high-tax states. Every state with a higher-than-average percentage of taxpayers paying the AMT is a blue state, based on this chart from the Tax Policy Center. Getting rid of the AMT wouldn’t be my highest priority for tax reform, but it’s also not something you’d put in the bill if hurting blue-state voters—or changing tax policy for the relative betterment of red states at the expense of blue states—were one of your top goals.

Third, if you see these tax breaks as unjustified, then their existence has been, in part, a favor to blue states at the expense of red states. Getting rid of that favor makes the tax code more, rather than less, level between red and blue states.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

White House

Another Warning Sign

The Mueller report is of course about Russian interference in the 2016 election and about the White House's interference in the resulting investigation. But I couldn’t help also reading the report as a window into the manner of administration that characterizes the Trump era, and therefore as another warning ... Read More
World

What’s So Great about Western Civilization

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter), One of the things I tell new parents is something that was told to me when my daughter still had that ... Read More
Film & TV

Jesus Is Not the Joker

Actors love to think they can play anything, but the job of any half-decent filmmaker is to tell them when they’re not right for a part. If the Rock wants to play Kurt Cobain, try to talk him out of it. Adam Sandler as King Lear is not a great match. And then there’s Joaquin Phoenix. He’s playing Jesus ... Read More
White House

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

I've finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel's Office. We've become accustomed to Trump making up ... Read More
U.S.

Supreme Court Mulls Citizenship Question for Census

Washington -- The oral arguments the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday will be more decorous than the gusts of judicial testiness that blew the case up to the nation’s highest tribunal. The case, which raises arcane questions of administrative law but could have widely radiating political and policy ... Read More