The Corner

RedState vs. National Right to Life

My friend Erick Erickson was one of those people who believed that Republicans, by supporting the Stupak amendment, missed a chance to defeat liberal health-care legislation. I think that the general rule Erickson is defending is the correct one: Don’t try to make legislation that is bad in its essentials slightly less bad. But it is a general rule, not an inviolable principle, and in this case I don’t think it applies.

Let’s assume, however, that I’m wrong (along with 99.4 percent of House Republicans), and Erickson and Rep. Shadegg are right. Even on that assumption, what was the point in continuing to fight over the question once it became clear that Republicans were not going to adopt the Shadegg strategy? If 100 Republicans had voted present and defeated the Stupak amendment in the hope of forcing a tougher choice on pro-life Democrats, I would have been able to see the point of their action even while disagreeing with it. I don’t see what Shadegg’s point was in voting present all by himself when it was clear that the amendment was going to pass by a large margin. Perhaps Shadegg was just annoyed at what he saw as the pigheaded refusal of other Republicans to see the wisdom of his advice. From the outside, it looks like pique.

That’s how Erickson’s latest salvo in this debate looks from the outside too. His post, again, contains some good advice to Republicans: They should not let themselves be content with meaningless amendments. But he adds a harsh and unjustified attack on the National Right to Life Committee. He claims that based on its past performance, it will “eke out some sort of minor compromise that undercuts the rest of the conservative movement and other pro-life groups—a compromise that does very little, but from which NRLC can raise some money.” The Stupak amendment wasn’t, in fact, a minor compromise, as evidenced by the way pro-choicers are currently reacting to it. When meaningless compromises have been broached in this debate–notably the Capps and Ellsworth amendments–it’s the NRLC that has successfully led the charge against them. From my dealings over the years with people at NRLC, I’d say that they have been more effective, and more selfless, than those at almost any other right-leaning organization. (Which doesn’t mean they’re always right, obviously.)

To say that the NRLC is right-leaning is, of course, a simplification. It is usually allied to conservatives and its cause is (arguably) conservative. But it is not simply a part of the conservative movement, and its job is not the same as those of other conservative organizations. Whatever their views on health-care legislation in general, pro-life organizations had to make the defeat of abortion funding their overriding priority. I am mystified by suggestions to the contrary.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

When the Tide Comes In

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader, “Save Ike from the Kikes.” I’d better explain. This weekend marks the one-year anniversary of the Nazi troll armies’ march ... Read More
Film & TV

Celebrity Activists Do Not Help

Michelle Williams, an actress, has decided to become a spokesman on the issue of pay inequality in her profession, and appears this month on the cover of Vanity Fair with a headline to that effect. This decision follows what she describes as a humiliating episode in which she learned in the pages of USA Today ... Read More
Culture

Washington in the Flesh, Almost

Canova's George Washington at the Frick Collection is the zenith of the museum's signature exhibition style. It's small, fewer than 20 objects. It's focused. It examines the creation of Antonio Canova's full-length sculpture of George Washington in Roman costume from 1821. It was Canova's (1757–1822) sole ... Read More