The Corner


Let’s Not Replace the SAT with THIS

Despite a lot of griping from the usual bunch of leftists, the SAT does a pretty good job of evaluating students’ college preparation — same for the ACT. But one Rebecca Kantar has them in her sights. She has developed a new test called Imbellus. In today’s Martin Center article, Professor Mark Bauerlein takes a look at Imbellus and concludes, “Be wary of this test.”

What is Imbellus all about? Bauerlein writes:

The Imbellus Web site states the thinking-skills premise succinctly: ‘Unlike traditional standardized tests, Imbellus Assessments measure how people think, not just what they know.’ Imbellus drops multiple-choice formats and instead devises simulations that call for ‘situational judgement.’ Assessors, then, evaluate ‘a user’s cognitive process.’ Game design and 3D technology make the test ‘relevant to 21st century work and modern life.’

Sounds gimmicky to me. Bauerlein, however, spots a deeper flaw:

I have listened to the interviews and talks, and pored over the Imbellus web site, and I haven’t found anything that affirms the value of humanistic study. The staff and researchers don’t praise beauty and sublimity; they invoke the workplace and automation. They don’t mention judgment and taste; they spotlight ‘decision-making.’ They don’t show great paintings and architecture; they display simulations of the natural world.

In short, knowledge about our culture counts for nothing here. If Imbellus catches on, there will be less reason than at present to teach students anything about the humanities.

Bauerlein concludes:

This is Silicon Valley culture at work, which levels human endeavor to productivity and innovation. Parents and humanities teachers should resist the Imbellus project and all others that reduce learning to functional behavior, tradition to irrelevance.

George Leef — George Leef is the director of research for the John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Bonfire of the Media Vanities

If the mainstream media had any capacity whatsoever for shame, embarrassment, or even honor, it would be raining anchors outside MSNBC headquarters. Hara-kiri knives would be selling out at Saks Fifth Avenue. Children would have to be advised not to flip on any news broadcast except Fox News Channel lest they ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More
White House

Our Long National Hysteria 

Our long national hysteria may not be over, but at least it should — by rights — be diminished. Robert Mueller delivered his long-awaited report on Friday, and Attorney General William Barr just released his summary of the findings. They completely vindicate President Trump regarding the allegation that ... Read More