The Corner

Ron Paul’s Electability

On Radio Derb and elsewhere I’ve been retailing the conventional wisdom that Ron Paul is unelectable. A listener takes issue:

Mr. Derbyshire:

In spite of his success in the recent Iowa straw poll and his continued ability to raise funds, I keep hearing that Ron Paul is “unelectable” for any number of reasons. This is silliness.

Yes, I cede your point about the number of liberty seeking Americans being less than the number of Americans wanting to live on the dole. It is a good point. But as a demonstration of his electability, one must only observe that Ron Paul has been a member of Congress since 1976. You only get there by winning elections (Texas isn’t Chicago, after all), and he has won quite a lot of them. Ergo, Ron Paul is demonstrably electable.

Isn’t that, as you might say, Q.E.D.?

If we look at statistics, by sheer number of elections won, he is perhaps more electable than anyone else trying out for the job right now.

Personally, I encourage people to vote their convictions rather than listening to the media about electability. Obama was considered unelectable at one point, if I recall correctly.

Certainly there are candidates aside from Ron Paul who may be able to tickle the ears of voters. But then haven’t we had enough of those people? I know I have.

If there is anyone in the group of asylum escapees who want to be the next President, I’m only certain that I know what Ron Paul would actually do. The rest, I’m fairly certain, will run off and do whatever is in the best interests of their re-election hopes, as have so many that have come before them. If Tea Partiers are more than just a bunch of former 700 club members, then I suspect Dr. Paul has a significantly better chance than he is being given by the conservative media, if there is such a thing.

I’d pick a few nits there. Dr. Paul has been in Congress for only 22 of the 36 years since 1976; and I find it hard to believe that anyone ever described Barack Obama as “unelectable.” Who would have dared?

My listener has a point, though. Dr. Paul has won 12 elections in places that look a lot like America. “Unelectable” doesn’t seem like such an apt word to be using. I shall stop using it.

John Derbyshire — Mr. Derbyshire is a former contributing editor of National Review.

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Great Misdirection

The House Democrats are frustrated, very frustrated. They’ve gotten themselves entangled in procedural disputes with the Trump administration that no one particularly cares about and that might be litigated for a very long time. A Washington Post report over the weekend spelled out how stymied Democrats ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More