The Corner

Politics & Policy

Rubio on Abortion and Rape

A lot of media outlets are pouncing on Senator Rubio for suggesting in last night’s debate that he has never “advocated” for exceptions to pro-life legislation in the cases of rape and incest, when he has strongly supported bills that include those exceptions. FactCheck.org is on the case: “Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said he had never advocated an exception to abortion bans for victims of rape or incest, but he cosponsored a bill in 2013 that contained just such exceptions.”

This is a stupid line of attack, and Rubio dealt with it easily in an exchange with Chris Cuomo on CNN this morning (starts near the four-minute mark). Rubio’s view appears to be that as an ideal matter there should be no exceptions for rape and incest, because all lives however conceived are worth protecting, but that he will work to provide the maximum feasible legal protection.

As he put it to Cuomo: “Think about it this way: I’m in favor of a 20-week abortion ban. Does that mean I’m in favor of abortions at 19 weeks? No. Any bill that reduces the number of abortions is a bill that I’m going to support. . . . I never said that I will only support a bill that has an exception in it. But I will support bills that have exceptions in it because they prevent abortions. I am here to try to save as many of those unborn children’s lives as possible.” Rubio also noted that the Catholic bishops have supported a lot of pro-life legislation that includes such exceptions for the same reasons he does, a point worth bearing in mind because the debate question had begun by noting Cardinal Dolan’s opposition to rape exceptions. In this exchange Rubio, though famously deft on tv, seems baffled by Cuomo’s inability to comprehend a simple point; perhaps the senator has not watched enough of his show. (Vox, I should note, got it right.)

Being against rape and incest exceptions, even as a theoretical matter, would be likely to hurt Rubio in the general election if he were the nominee. Exceptions have very strong majority support. And I’m not sure, given how extremely theoretical a matter this is, that Republican candidates ought to be talking about it. But there’s no inconsistency between Rubio’s stated position and his record.

(disclosure)

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Culture

‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’

It was just one more segment to fill out the hour, and thereby fill the long 24 hours of Saturday’s cable news on November 2. Or so it seemed. Navy SEAL Mike Ritland was on the Fox News program Watters World to talk to Jesse Watters about trained German shepherds like the one used in the raid that found ... Read More
Film & TV

The Manly Appeal of Ford v Ferrari

There used to be a lot of overlap between what we think of as a Hollywood studio picture (designed to earn money) and an awards movie (designed to fill the trophy case, usually with an accompanying loss of money). Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More
U.S.

What Happened to California Republicans?

From 1967 to 2019, Republicans controlled the California governorship for 31 of 52 years. So why is there currently not a single statewide Republican officeholder? California also has a Democratic governor and Democratic supermajorities in both houses of the state legislature. Only seven of California’s 53 ... Read More