The Corner

Rubio on Taxes at the South Carolina Debate

Right after Cruz defended his tax plan, Rubio was asked to defend his. Kimberley Strassel of the Wall Street Journal said, “Senator Rubio, you have the highest tax rates of anyone up on the stage, in terms of the top tax rates. 35%. Which some economists say would limit its potential to boost economic growth.”

Rubio did an excellent job of defending the child credit. But it’s worth dwelling, as he did not, on the oddity of the question. The top tax rate in Rubio’s plan would kick in at $300,000 for joint filers and $150,000 for single filers. The rate would be 35 percent, which is lower than today’s top rate of 43.4. (Nineteen percent lower, in fact.) By historical standards, that’s a low top rate: In the last 80 years, we have had a lower top rate in only 5 years. And in those years, we had higher taxes on capital than Rubio is proposing: He would abolish taxes on capital gains and dividends for new investments.

The Tax Foundation has scored the presidential candidates’ plans using the kind of supply-side assumptions that the Journal editorial page favors. According to the Foundation, Rubio’s plan would increase growth by more than the Bush, Cruz, or Trump plans, all of which feature lower top tax rates–which suggests that maybe minimizing the top tax rate on labor income is not the most important consideration in designing tax policy.

So: Rubio’s plan cuts the tax rate on high earners’ labor income by a lot, and to a historically low level. It eliminates taxes on their new investments. It promotes economic growth according to the usual logic the Wall Street Journal applies to tax plans. And still the question comes from one of its editors: Why don’t you cut taxes on the very highest earners even more?

I’m not saying that the Journal is wrong to want lower tax rates: I agree with it on that question. I do think that economic conservatives sometimes lack perspective on this question.

(disclosure)

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Hillary Ruins the Plan

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the first in a series of excerpts.  There really was a collusion plot. It really did target our election system. It absolutely sought to usurp our capacity for ... Read More
Economy & Business

The Great Mystery

Kevin Williamson disputes my characterization of his riposte. He writes: I wrote that people can choose what kind of work they want to do, and what kind of services they want to consume, without any help from Michael. Kevin then accuses me of being a stouthearted defender of the “Real America.” If ... Read More
Religion

Another Pop-Culture Christian Loses His Faith

It’s happened again. For the second time in three weeks, a prominent (at least in Evangelical circles) Christian has renounced his faith. In July, it was Josh Harris, a pastor and author of the mega-best-selling purity-culture book I Kissed Dating Goodbye. This month, it’s Hillsong United songwriter and ... Read More
Culture

‘Good Verse, Bad Verse, and Chaos’

I love reading Sarah Ruden, and I’ve enjoyed the attention given to Walt Whitman in these pages over the last few days. Ruden gives the poet the back of her hand for being championed by — angels and ministers of grace, defend us! — intellectuals and professors, a poet “whom ordinary Americans most ... Read More