The Corner

Politics & Policy

Shhhhh, Mr. Mayor

Rudy Giuliani (YouTube screengrab via ABC News)

For almost two years now, I’ve been hearing that unless you think the allegations of collusion are conspiratorial nonsense — or, worse, a Deep State hoax —  you are a conspiracy theorist or an idiot of one variety or another. For instance:

I’ve always been a skeptic about most of the outsized versions of the Russia-collusion narrative put out by the resistance types, but I’ve also been a skeptic of this kind of thing as well. I never thought that it was crazy to think that the Trump campaign wanted to collude with Russia. We’ve known that since the details of the Trump Tower meeting spilled. And we knew Paul Manafort was a scummy Russian remora for a long time. And, the moment the MAGAers started defending Julian Assange as a heroic truth-teller, you knew that someone in that orbit was too chummy with the Russian intelligence cut-out.

Anyway, it will be interesting to see how the folks who mock and ridicule the collusion theory incorporate Rudy Giuliani’s performance last night:

From the Washington Post’s write up:

“You just misstated my position,” Giuliani said. “I never said there was no collusion between the campaign, or between people in the campaign.”

Cuomo’s face contorted into an expression of disbelief. “Yes, you have,” he shot back.

As recently as July, Giuliani was asked by Fox News contributor Guy Benson, “Regardless of whether collusion would be a crime, is it still the position of you and your client that there was no collusion with the Russians whatsoever on behalf of the Trump campaign?”

“Correct,” Giuliani responded at the time.

But on Wednesday, Giuliani appeared to amend his previous comments on the subject.

“I said the president of the United States,” he protested, arguing that he had only ever said Trump himself was not connected to any Russian meddling in the 2016 election. “There is not a single bit of evidence the president of the United States committed the only crime you can commit here, conspired with the Russians to hack the DNC.”

The president’s attorney has gone from parroting the president’s own declarative positions (“There was no collusion,” “witch hunt,” “hoax” etc.) to, in effect, “Sure, the campaign may have colluded with Russia, but my client has plausible deniability he knew anything about it. And, besides, if he colluded with the Russians he wasn’t president at the time.”

It’s possible Giuliani had too many martinis before he went on CNN. But, even so, you don’t have to be an imbecile to think Giuliani’s not helping.

Most Popular

White House

The Impeachment Clock

Adam Schiff’s impeachment inquiry is incoherent. Given the impossibility of a senatorial conviction, the only strategy is to taint the president with the brand of impeachment and weaken him in the 2020 election. Yet Schiff seems to have no sense that the worm has already turned. Far from tormenting Trump and ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Clock

Adam Schiff’s impeachment inquiry is incoherent. Given the impossibility of a senatorial conviction, the only strategy is to taint the president with the brand of impeachment and weaken him in the 2020 election. Yet Schiff seems to have no sense that the worm has already turned. Far from tormenting Trump and ... Read More
Economy & Business

Who Owns FedEx?

You may have seen (or heard on a podcast) that Fred Smith so vehemently objects to the New York Times report contending that FedEx paid nothing in federal taxes that he's challenged New York Times publisher A. G. Sulzberger to a public debate and pointed out that "the New York Times paid zero federal income tax ... Read More
Economy & Business

Who Owns FedEx?

You may have seen (or heard on a podcast) that Fred Smith so vehemently objects to the New York Times report contending that FedEx paid nothing in federal taxes that he's challenged New York Times publisher A. G. Sulzberger to a public debate and pointed out that "the New York Times paid zero federal income tax ... Read More
Elections

Warren’s Wealth Tax Is Unethical

Senator Warren would impose a 2 percent annual tax on wealth above $50 million, and a 6 percent annual tax on wealth above $1 billion. These numbers may seem small, but remember that they would be applied every year. With wealth taxes, small numbers have large effects. Applied to an asset yielding a steady ... Read More
Elections

Warren’s Wealth Tax Is Unethical

Senator Warren would impose a 2 percent annual tax on wealth above $50 million, and a 6 percent annual tax on wealth above $1 billion. These numbers may seem small, but remember that they would be applied every year. With wealth taxes, small numbers have large effects. Applied to an asset yielding a steady ... Read More
Immigration

The ‘Welfare Magnet’ for Immigrants

That term refers to a controversial concept -- and a salient one, given the Trump administration's efforts to make it harder for immigrants to use welfare in the U.S. A new study finds that there's something to it: Immigrants were more likely to come to Denmark when they could get more welfare there. From the ... Read More
Immigration

The ‘Welfare Magnet’ for Immigrants

That term refers to a controversial concept -- and a salient one, given the Trump administration's efforts to make it harder for immigrants to use welfare in the U.S. A new study finds that there's something to it: Immigrants were more likely to come to Denmark when they could get more welfare there. From the ... Read More