The Corner

Saddam, WMD, and Preemption-Revisionism of the Revisionism?

We are supposed to hear on 60 Minutes from an FBI interrogator that Saddam hid knowledge that he had lost his WMD program, in hopes of retaining deterrence against Iran, and on assurance he had the personnel and infrastructure to reformulate it rather quickly once our vigilance grew lax — and in a general context that he thought he would never be removed by U.S. ground forces.

The entire question is going to be revisited — especially when we remember that Qaddafi gave up his program in December 2003 a week after Saddam was photographed in his spider hole; the Iranians (if one were to believe the NIE) supposedly began cessation of their nuclear weapons program at about the same time, and A. Q. Khan quite mysteriously a little later in January 2004 was detained in Pakistan and his proliferation program stopped. All of this is more than a coincidence, and suggests that the world might be a much more dangerous place had we not acted in 2003.

And by the same token, we are getting a third look at preemption, a doctrine that went from a legitimate consideration, to a supposed Strangelovian abomination — back again to a legitimate consideration? Nicolas Sarkozy raised the issue in relationship to Iran. Both Mike Huckabee and Barack Obama have talked of preemptive raids into Pakistan. But now we hear that the Nato team of war-planners — Europeans no less! —  have announced that they retain the right to preempt with nuclear weapons against terrorist-sponsoring regimes with WMD-a warning that matched or trumped both our own much maligned 2002 National Security Strategy document and George Bush’s famous March 6, 2003 preemption address.

As Iraq continues to quiet down, expect stranger things yet to follow.

Most Popular

Media

About That ‘Uncoverable’ Biden Story

Journalists claim they can’t cover the New York Post’s Hunter Biden email scoop because the underlying evidence has yet to been verified. Also, they won’t look for any verifying evidence because there isn’t enough evidence. It’s quite the conundrum. Because other than the now-corroborated emails, ... Read More
Media

About That ‘Uncoverable’ Biden Story

Journalists claim they can’t cover the New York Post’s Hunter Biden email scoop because the underlying evidence has yet to been verified. Also, they won’t look for any verifying evidence because there isn’t enough evidence. It’s quite the conundrum. Because other than the now-corroborated emails, ... Read More
Media

‘Anonymous’ Falls Flat

On the menu today: The op-ed page of the New York Times made the deliberate decision to hoodwink America about the identity of “Anonymous”; the sense of guilt that pervades legacy media -- a very apt label; and wondering whether or not we will even see long lines on Election Day with early voting being so ... Read More
Media

‘Anonymous’ Falls Flat

On the menu today: The op-ed page of the New York Times made the deliberate decision to hoodwink America about the identity of “Anonymous”; the sense of guilt that pervades legacy media -- a very apt label; and wondering whether or not we will even see long lines on Election Day with early voting being so ... Read More

Another Pollster Sees a Trump Win

The Trafalgar Group’s Robert Cahaly is an outlier among pollsters in that he thinks President Trump will carry Michigan, Pennsylvania, or both, and hence be reelected with roughly 280 electoral votes. (I explained his thinking here.) Last week another pollster, Jim Lee of Susquehanna Polling and Research, ... Read More

Another Pollster Sees a Trump Win

The Trafalgar Group’s Robert Cahaly is an outlier among pollsters in that he thinks President Trump will carry Michigan, Pennsylvania, or both, and hence be reelected with roughly 280 electoral votes. (I explained his thinking here.) Last week another pollster, Jim Lee of Susquehanna Polling and Research, ... Read More
White House

Hell, Yes

Editor’s Note: If you would like to read more pros and cons on voting for President Trump, further essays on the subject, each from a different perspective, can be found here, here, here, here, and here. These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National ... Read More
White House

Hell, Yes

Editor’s Note: If you would like to read more pros and cons on voting for President Trump, further essays on the subject, each from a different perspective, can be found here, here, here, here, and here. These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National ... Read More